Is \( e^{i\theta} \) an Eigenfunction of the Given Operators?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumMech
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the function \( e^{i\theta} \) is an eigenfunction of the operator \( \hat{\Omega} = \frac{d}{d\theta} \sin \theta \frac{d}{d\theta} \). It is concluded that \( e^{i\theta} \) does not satisfy the eigenvalue equation \( \hat{\Omega}f = \lambda f \), thus it is not an eigenfunction of this operator. Additionally, the operator \( \hat{\Omega} = \frac{d^2}{dx^2} - 4x^2 \) is also discussed, with the consensus that it does not yield an eigenfunction either. The importance of verifying the eigenvalue equation for determining eigenfunctions is emphasized. Overall, both operators fail to produce \( e^{i\theta} \ as an eigenfunction.
QuantumMech
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
For the following:

<br /> \begin{gather*}<br /> \hat{\Omega} = \frac{d}{d\theta}sin \theta \frac{d}{d\theta}\\function = e^{i\theta}<br /> \end{gather*}<br />

Use the operator on the function and is it an eigenfunction of \hat{\Omega}?

Thanks. I don't think it is.

There is also another problem with \hat{\Omega} = \frac{d^2}{dx^2} - 4x^2. I don't think this is an eigenfunction either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It isn't an eigenfunction for any of he 2 op-s.

Daniel.
 


No, you are not missing anything. In order for a function to be an eigenfunction of an operator, it must satisfy the eigenvalue equation \hat{\Omega}f = \lambda f, where \lambda is a constant. In this case, the given function e^{i\theta} does not satisfy this equation, therefore it is not an eigenfunction of \hat{\Omega}. Similarly, the second problem with \hat{\Omega} = \frac{d^2}{dx^2} - 4x^2 also does not satisfy the eigenvalue equation and is not an eigenfunction. It is important to carefully check the requirements for a function to be an eigenfunction before determining its status.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
736
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K