Is Eisenstein's Criterion Applicable to Polynomials in the Gaussian Integers?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ted123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rings
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Eisenstein's Criterion can be applied to polynomials in the Gaussian integers, denoted as R = &mathbb;Z[i]. The criterion states that for a polynomial f(x) = a_0 + a_1x + ... + a_nx^n in R[x], if the coefficients satisfy specific conditions regarding a prime ideal P, then f is irreducible. An example discussed is the polynomial f(x) = x^2 + (1+i) in &mathbb;Z[i][x], which adheres to the criterion. Additionally, the polynomial f(x) = x^7 + (3-i)x^2 + (3+4i)x + (4+2i) is analyzed for irreducibility using Gaussian primes like 2+i.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Eisenstein's Criterion for irreducibility.
  • Familiarity with Gaussian integers, &mathbb;Z[i].
  • Knowledge of prime ideals in integral domains.
  • Basic polynomial algebra in the context of rings.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Eisenstein's Criterion in various integral domains.
  • Explore the properties of Gaussian primes and their role in polynomial factorization.
  • Learn about irreducibility tests for polynomials in &mathbb;Z[i][x].
  • Investigate examples of irreducible polynomials in other rings, such as &mathbb;Z[x] and &mathbb{Q}[x].
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying polynomial irreducibility, particularly those focusing on Gaussian integers and integral domains.

Ted123
Messages
428
Reaction score
0
My statement of Eisenstein's criterion is the following:

Let R be an integral domain, P be prime ideal of R and f(x) = a_0 + a_1x + ... + a_n x^n \in R[x].

Suppose
(1) a_0 , a_1 , ... , a_{n-1} \in P
(2) a_0 \in P but a_0 \not\in P^2
(3) a_n \not\in P

Then f has no divisors of degree d such that 1\leqslant d \leqslant n-1. In particular if f is primitive and (1)-(3) hold then f is irreducible.


I would like to see an example of how we can use this criterion in the Gaussian integers R= \mathbb{Z}.

I know 1+i is a Gaussian prime so can I anyone give me a quick example of a polynomial with coefficients in \mathbb{Z} and how to use this criterion?

I know how to use it when R=\mathbb{Z}, for example to show f(x)= x^2 -1 \in \mathbb{Z}[x] is irreducible we just check that for a prime p: p | a_n, p | a_i for all i&lt;n and p^2 \not | a_0 . I'm confused as to how to use the version of it above for a polynomial in \mathbb{Z}<i>[x]</i>.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ted123 said:
My statement of Eisenstein's criterion is the following:

Let R be an integral domain, P be prime ideal of R and f(x) = a_0 + a_1x + ... + a_n x^n \in R[x].

Suppose
(1) a_0 , a_1 , ... , a_{n-1} \in P
(2) a_0 \in P but a_0 \not\in P^2
(3) a_n \not\in P

Then f has no divisors of degree d such that 1\leqslant d \leqslant n-1. In particular if f is primitive and (1)-(3) hold then f is irreducible.


I would like to see an example of how we can use this criterion in the Gaussian integers R= \mathbb{Z}.

I know 1+i is a Gaussian prime so can I anyone give me a quick example of a polynomial with coefficients in \mathbb{Z} and how to use this criterion?

I know how to use it when R=\mathbb{Z}, for example to show f(x)= x^2 -1 \in \mathbb{Z}[x] is irreducible we just check that for a prime p: p | a_n, p | a_i for all i&lt;n and p^2 \not | a_0 . I'm confused as to how to use the version of it above for a polynomial in \mathbb{Z}<i>[x]</i>.



What about the polynomial \,x^2+(1+i)\in\left(\mathbb{Z}<i>\right)[x]\,</i> ?

BTW, in your example, \,x^2-1\in\mathbb{Z}[x]\, is reducible...;>)

DonAntonio
 
DonAntonio said:
What about the polynomial \,x^2+(1+i)\in\left(\mathbb{Z}<i>\right)[x]\,</i> ?

BTW, in your example, \,x^2-1\in\mathbb{Z}[x]\, is reducible...;>)

DonAntonio


Is the polynomial f(x) = x^7 + (3-i)x^2 + (3+4i)x + (4+2i) \in \mathbb{Z}<i>[x]</i> irreducible?

2+i is a Gauassian prime isn't it? And 2+i does not divide 1, 2+i | 3-i , 2+i | 3+4i , 2+i | 4+2i and (2+i)^2 = 3+4i which does not divide 4+2i.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K