Is Electronegativity Applicable to Ions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the applicability of electronegativity to ions, specifically comparing the electronegativities of ions such as O-, N+, S-, and O+. Participants explore the factors influencing electronegativity and how to arrange different ions in terms of their electronegativity values.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about methods to compare the electronegativities of ions, questioning how to arrange them in order.
  • Others suggest that atomic radius and electron shielding play significant roles in determining electronegativity.
  • A participant proposes that the electronegativity difference between neutral atoms and their ions is small, leading to a suggested order of O+, O, N+, N.
  • Another participant challenges this order, asserting that the correct order is O+ > N+ > O > N.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the definition of electronegativity in relation to ions, suggesting it may not be applicable and that effective nuclear charge might be a more relevant concept.
  • There is mention of different methods and scales used by scientists to calculate electronegativity, indicating variability in interpretations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct order of electronegativities for the ions discussed. There are competing views on the applicability of electronegativity to ions and the factors that should be considered in such comparisons.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the debate may stem from differing definitions and interpretations of electronegativity, particularly in relation to ions versus neutral atoms.

zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0
Is there any method to compare the electronegativity of ions such as O-, N+, S-, O+?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Sure. Think about what plays a role in the electronegativities of atoms, for example, why is F more electronegative than H?
 
F is more electronegative because it has smaller radius w.r.t H.
So I presume you mean size factor will play a role in electronegativity.
Consider these ions-

O (8en & 8p), O+ (7en & 8p), N+ (6en & 7p), N (7en & 7p)

Here how do you determine the sizes?
I have a method to find out the sizes of isoelectronic species. No idea about this one.
 
Right, it has to do with radius, but also the number of electrons shielding the nucleus and the charge of the nucleus itself. Think of it like this: F has very few electrons between the "edge" of the atom and the nucleus, and the nucleus has 9 protons (which are charged).

When dealing with ions, look at the number of electrons in the valence shell, the number of electrons in non-valence shells (i.e. how will these shield attraction effects from the nucleus on the valence electrons?) and the charge of the nucleus itself. For example, in an anion, there are more valence electrons than in its respective neutral atom, so the total nuclear charge is less than the charge of the valence electrons. This means that the electrons will not be "pulled in" towards the nucleus as much, resulting in a higher radius.

So using this information, would you guess that O is more or less electronegative than O+?
 
You are explaining a method to compare the radius of an atom and its ion (which I already know)
What I asked was how do you compare ( in other words arrange) ions of different atoms in the increasing order/decreasing order of electronegativies. Like-


O (8en & 8p), O+ (7en & 8p), N+ (6en & 7p), N (7en & 7p)
 
My fault, sorry for the misunderstanding.

When you're looking at O and N, they're very close to each other on the periodic table, so the electronegativity difference between the neutral atom and the ion is going to be about the same. You know that O+ and N+ are more electronegative than their neutral atoms, and that O is more electronegative than N. So from here, you look at the difference in electronegativity between the two neutral atoms (I think it's around 0.4-0.5). I'm not sure of the exact number, but the change in electronegativity from a neutral atom to its cation is pretty small. So for the case you gave, the order (decreasing) is O+, O, N+, N. Does that make sense?
 
pzona said:
the order (decreasing) is O+, O, N+, N. Does that make sense?

No it doesn't. The correct answer is O+ > N+ > O > N.
 
Alright, so it's been a while since I've done electronegativities of atoms vs. ions.

I suppose the ratio of protons to electrons comes into play here. Since you're dealing with fairly small numbers (6, 7, 8) a difference of one electron will make a bigger difference than I expected. Let me check my gen chem text and see if I can find anything, and I'll get back to you.

If anyone else has input on this feel free to help; clearly I don't know as much about this as I thought.
 
Abdul Quadeer said:
No it doesn't. The correct answer is O+ > N+ > O > N.

electronegativity is a measure of the ability of an atom to attract Bonding electrons in a molecule. So i believe that this term is not defined on ION. I believe you are talking about effective nuclear charge, so the arrangement is correct. Electronegativity is a hypothetical value based on Maths, so different scientists have diff ways of calculating it thus give rise to different scales.
 
  • #10
gerrardz said:
electronegativity is a measure of the ability of an atom to attract Bonding electrons in a molecule. So i believe that this term is not defined on ION. I believe you are talking about effective nuclear charge, so the arrangement is correct. Electronegativity is a hypothetical value based on Maths, so different scientists have diff ways of calculating it thus give rise to different scales.

Yes it is true. This debate is meaningless by definition of electronegativity>
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K