Is Engineering Not for You? Don't Give Up - Our Expert Opinion!

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zzoo4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between proficiency in physics and pursuing a career in engineering. Participants share their experiences and opinions on whether struggling with physics should deter someone from engineering, particularly in fields like computer hardware engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses sadness over a teacher's comment suggesting that poor performance in physics should lead to giving up on engineering, asserting that they disagree with this notion.
  • Another participant encourages perseverance, stating that one should never give up.
  • A correction is offered, suggesting that if one continues to struggle with physics, it may be wise to reconsider pursuing engineering, but self-study is recommended to improve understanding.
  • Some participants argue that discouraging statements are often made in early college courses to filter out less committed students, emphasizing the importance of not quitting.
  • It is noted that while physics is important for engineering, other subjects such as mathematics, chemistry, and communication skills are also crucial for success in the field.
  • A participant shares their personal experience of switching from physics to mechanical engineering, indicating that it was a beneficial decision for them.
  • Another participant highlights that the relevance of physics varies by engineering discipline, suggesting that fields like software engineering may not require as strong a foundation in physics as mechanical engineering does.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of mathematics over physics in certain engineering fields, particularly telecommunications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the necessity of excelling in physics for all engineering fields, with some asserting its importance while others argue that it may not be as critical in certain disciplines. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of struggling with physics on pursuing engineering.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying opinions on the importance of physics depending on the specific engineering discipline, indicating that the relevance of physics may not be uniform across all fields. There are also differing views on the impact of early discouragement from instructors on students' career aspirations.

zzoo4
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Lol give up engineering??

Lol today My teacher said today, "If you suck at physics, you should give up engineering".

After hearing this I am kind of sad.. b/c I wanted to be a computer hardware engineering and he just discouraged me...

Is this true?? Well I don't think so though
 
Physics news on Phys.org


never give up.
 


correction: "If you continue to suck at physics, you should give up engineering"

basically, if want to excel in engineering (just about any field of), it will be a good idea to do some self studying so you don't suck in physics
 


They say this kind of stuff in freshman and sophmore level classes. I think it is to "weed out" the less serious students. Don't quit.
 


This is the sort of idiotic reverse psychology that some people practice. If you want to be an engineer, physics will be an important subject. But so will mathematics, chemistry, statistics, economics, Literature (YES, to be a good engineer you must communicate well), and so forth.

Give up only if you don't think you really want to achieve this goal. However, before you discard a goal in life, you need to have another one ready to put in its place. A life without goals is a waste.
 


zzoo4 said:
Lol today My teacher said today, "If you suck at physics, you should give up engineering".

After hearing this I am kind of sad.. b/c I wanted to be a computer hardware engineering and he just discouraged me...

Is this true?? Well I don't think so though

If you want to be an engineer, don't give up so easily.
 


Let's rephrase it in a more positive way: "You won't be a successful engineer if you continue to suck at physics".

If you really want to be an engineer, don't give up. Learn some physics instead.
 


hhaha thank you everyone.
 


Just curious. How did you guys learn physics? or taught yourself?
 
  • #10


FWIW, I switched from physics to mechanical engineering at the end of my freshman year, worked for me. Good luck!
 
  • #11


zzoo4 said:
Just curious. How did you guys learn physics? or taught yourself?

most engineering classes involve physics discussions; they're unavoidable. You just have to dig into them instead of closing your eyes and blowing through them. Really try to understand what's going on and if you're having problems, try to find specific questions to ask the teacher, try to find out where your understanding is going wrong. When I was an undergraduate, I often solved my own problems when trying to formulate my questions better.
 
  • #12


It depends on what sort of engineering, mechanical engineering you'd definitely need to be good at physics.
Software eng/computersystems/telecomms etc, it's not so important.
Other than the one physics subject I had in first year, the only 'physics' type of stuff I need in my telecommunications degree is signal processing, which is mostly maths.

I think it's more important to be good at maths than to know about heat transfer or the equations of motion etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K