Is Entropy in Non-Scientific Contexts Subjective?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of entropy beyond thermodynamics, specifically in contexts like card sorting. It establishes that while a fresh, sorted deck of cards represents the lowest entropy state, the definition of "order" is subjective and can vary based on the chosen property of interest. The author argues that entropy is fundamentally a property of thermodynamic macrostates, defined by variables such as pressure (P), volume (V), number of moles (n), and temperature (T), rather than a characteristic of individual microstates. This leads to the conclusion that entropy can be perceived as subjective when applied to non-scientific contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic concepts, particularly entropy
  • Familiarity with macrostates and microstates in statistical mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of properties of ideal gases, including P, V, n, and T
  • Awareness of subjective versus objective measures in scientific contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of statistical mechanics and their relation to entropy
  • Explore the concept of macrostates versus microstates in thermodynamics
  • Investigate the implications of subjective measures in scientific analysis
  • Examine case studies on entropy in non-traditional contexts, such as information theory
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, students of thermodynamics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of scientific concepts like entropy in both scientific and non-scientific contexts.

DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
24,146
Reaction score
8,269
So I get into these discussions on other ... less scientific ... fora, and then run into trouble and have to come here for correct answers.

I state these as assumptions but they are really questions. Please correct.
  • Entropy is usually applied in a thermodynamics context, but it can be applied to any other source of order just as easily.
  • A deck of cards can have its entropy measured.
  • A fresh, sorted deck of cards has the lowest entropy possible, as it is in the highest ordered state possible.
But:
  • The "order" of a deck of cards is entirely arbitrary. There's nothing objective about sequential human symbols.
  • I could just as arbitrarily decide that the property of interest isn't sequential printed numbers, rather - I don't know - weight. The deck of cards is at its lowest entropic state when they are sorted heaviest card (most ink) to lightest card.
  • I could even leave the property of interest the same and arbitrarily decide what is ordered and what is not:
    • I start with a sequential deck of cards. I decide they are ordered.
    • I shuffle them, and measure the disorder.
    • I then declare the new state to be perfectly ordered, and shuffle again.
So, either entropy is dependent on the property (or properties) of interest (and therefore subjective) or I am misapplying the concept of entropy.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Entropy isn't really a property of a single microstate, e.g. a way of ordering a deck of cards, or a combination of particle position and momenta in a classical point particle ideal gas. It's a property of a thermodynamical macrostate, like a combination of variables ##P,V,n,T## of an ideal gas, and it gets larger when there is a greater number of microstates that are consistent with that apparent macroscopic state.

It's a bit difficult to define "macroscopic" variables for a deck of cards, but you could for instance sum the number of red cards in the deck that have a black card both before and after them to obtain a variable that is some kind of average over the microstate variables.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu, jim mcnamara, Dale and 1 other person
Shuffled Cards, Messy Desks, and Disorderly Dorm Rooms — Examples of Entropy Increase? Nonsense!
by F. L. Lambert
http://entropysite.oxy.edu/shuffled_cards.html#c1
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913, Klystron and DrClaude

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
841
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K