Is Every Convergent Sequence Also Contractive?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guthrie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
Click For Summary
A contractive sequence is always convergent, but the converse—that every convergent sequence is contractive—does not hold true. A user presents a counterexample with the sequence .9, 1, 1, .99, 1, 1, .999, 1, 1, .9999, which converges to 1. However, the differences between successive terms do not consistently decrease, as every third difference is 0. This example illustrates that not all convergent sequences are contractive, highlighting the need for careful distinction between the two concepts.
Guthrie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Just a quick question regarding contractive sequences and convergence.

I understand that a contractive sequence is always convergent, but is the converse also true? i.e. If a sequence is convergent then its contractive.

I can't think of a logical proof to this, yet a plausible counterexample escapes me.

I would appreciate any advice to point me in the right direction.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I had to look up the definition of contractive sequence. If I got it right, here is a counterexample that you might want.
.9, 1, 1, .99, 1, 1, .999, 1, 1, .9999, etc. This converges to 1, but successive differences never form a decreasing sequence, since every third difference is 0, while the others aren't.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
11K