Can I use the definition of continuity of function from Baby Rudin, setting X as empty set?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Rudin does not specify X is a non-empty set but he supposes p is in X.

Anyway if I use it for empty set X, then is a function with a domain E which is a subset of X continuous at p?

One more extra question: If a definition contains two statements that contradict each other in its hypotheses, what happens? (I know if a theorem contains these things, then the theorem becomes vacuously true.)

Note: for the Rudin's definition, please look at the attatched file.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# Is every empty set function continuous?

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

- Similar discussions for: Is every empty set function continuous?

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**