Is f continuous if f^-1(S) is closed for all closed sets S?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the continuity of a function f, specifically proving that f is continuous if and only if the preimage f^-1(S) is closed for every closed set S. Participants explore the relationship between the complement of the preimage and the preimage of the complement, establishing that (f^-1 S) complement equals f^-1(S complement). The reasoning involves analyzing elements in the domain and codomain of f, emphasizing the importance of understanding the spaces involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real analysis concepts, particularly continuity and closed sets.
  • Familiarity with function notation and preimages in mathematical contexts.
  • Knowledge of set theory, including operations on sets such as complements.
  • Basic understanding of topology, specifically in relation to closed sets in metric spaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of continuous functions in real analysis.
  • Learn about the relationship between closed sets and continuity in topology.
  • Explore the concept of preimages and their significance in function analysis.
  • Investigate examples of continuous and discontinuous functions to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone studying real analysis or topology, particularly those interested in the properties of continuous functions and set theory.

im2fastfouru
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Any help on this problem would be appreciated

a) Show that (f^-1 S)compliment is equal to f^-1(S compliment) for any set S of reals.


Then use part a) to show The function f is continuous iff f^-1(S) is closed for every closed set S.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
im2fastfouru said:
Any help on this problem would be appreciated

a) Show that (f^-1 S)compliment is equal to f^-1(S compliment) for any set S of reals.


Then use part a) to show The function f is continuous iff f^-1(S) is closed for every closed set S.

Well, i am going to give a shot, but wait until some other people answer this as well.

Let

[tex]x\in \bar f^{-1}(S)=>x\notin f^{-1}(S)=>x\in f(S)=>y\in S=>y\notin \bar S=>x\notin f(\bar S)=>x \in f^{-1}(\bar S)[/tex]


SO from here:

[tex]\bar f^{-1}(S)\subseteq f^{-1}(\bar S)[/tex]

I think now you should go the other way around. I am not sure whether my reasoning is correct though. SO let someone else comment on this before you conclude on your answer.
 
sutupidmath said:
[tex]x\in \bar f^{-1}(S)=>x\notin f^{-1}(S)=>x\in f(S)=>y\in S=>y\notin \bar S=>x\notin f(\bar S)=>x \in f^{-1}(\bar S)[/tex]


Can you explain how you conclude that x must be in f(S) (third step)?

It is helpful to think of the domain and the codomain as different spaces (although here they both happen to be R, I assume).

You start with an x in the domain of f, in the statement I ask you to explain you consider the same x as an element of the codomain. I'm not saying that this can never be correct, but I think here it is not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K