Is f(z) Constant in Domain D When f(z) - conj(f(z)) Equals Zero?

  • Thread starter Thread starter squaremeplz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a complex function \( f(z) \) and its relationship with its conjugate, specifically examining the condition \( f(z) - \text{conj}(f(z)) = 0 \) within a domain \( D \). Participants are tasked with proving that \( f(z) \) is constant in this domain, utilizing concepts from complex analysis such as the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of expressing \( f(z) \) in terms of its real and imaginary components, leading to the conclusion that the imaginary part must be constant. There is a discussion about the conditions under which \( u(x,y) \) equals zero and how this relates to the constancy of \( f(z) \). Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the analyticity of the functions involved and seek clarity on the relationships between the expressions presented.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the implications of the Cauchy-Riemann equations and the nature of the functions involved. There is recognition of the need to connect the constancy of \( f(z) - \text{conj}(f(z)) \) back to \( f(z) \) itself, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the assumption that both \( f(z) \) and \( f(z) - \text{conj}(f(z)) \) are analytic in the domain \( D \), which is central to the discussion. There is also mention of potential contradictions arising from the derived conditions on \( v(x,y) \).

squaremeplz
Messages
114
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that [tex]f(z)[/tex] and [tex]f(z) - conj(f(z))[/tex]

proof [tex]f(z)[/tex] is constant on D

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



If I write the equations as [tex]f(x,y) = u(x,y) + i*v(x,y)[/tex]

then [tex]f(z) - conj(f(z))[/tex]

= [tex]u(x,y) + i*v(x,y) - (u(x,y) - i*v(x,y))[/tex]

and the [tex]u(x,y)[/tex] cancel out and we are left with

[tex]f(z) - conj(f(z)) = 2*i*v(x,y)[/tex]

and by the Cauchy Riemann eq

[tex]\frac {du}{dx} = \frac {dv}{dy}[/tex]

[tex]\frac {du}{dy} = - \frac {dv}{dx}[/tex]

since [tex]u(x,y) = 0[/tex] for [tex]f(z) - conj(f(z)) = 2*i*v(x,y)[/tex]

in order for [tex]\frac {du}{dy} u(x,y) = - 2*i*\frac {dv}{dx}v(x,y)[/tex]

f(z) has to be constand on D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
squaremeplease said:

Homework Statement



Suppose that [tex]f(z)[/tex] and [tex]f(z) - conj(f(z))[/tex]
I don't understand what you are given here. The things that you are supposing are statements that are assumed to be true. All you have here are two expressions, f(z) and f(z) - conj(f(z)). Is there some relationship between these two expressions, such as an equation?
squaremeplease said:
proof [tex]f(z)[/tex] is constant on D

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If I write the equations as [tex]f(x,y) = u(x,y) + i*v(x,y)[/tex]

then [tex]f(z) - conj(f(z))[/tex]

= [tex]u(x,y) + i*v(x,y) - (u(x,y) - i*v(x,y))[/tex]

and the [tex]u(x,y)[/tex] cancel out and we are left with

[tex]f(z) - conj(f(z)) = 2*i*v(x,y)[/tex]

and by the Cauchy Riemann eq

[tex]\frac {du}{dx} = \frac {dv}{dy}[/tex]

[tex]\frac {du}{dy} = - \frac {dv}{dx}[/tex]

since [tex]u(x,y) = 0[/tex] for [tex]f(z) - conj(f(z)) = 2*i*v(x,y)[/tex]

in order for [tex]\frac {du}{dy} u(x,y) = - 2*i*\frac {dv}{dx}v(x,y)[/tex]

f(z) has to be constand on D
 
Im sorry, the problem is: assume that t [tex]f(z)[/tex] and [tex]f(z) - conj(f(z))[/tex] are both analytic in a domain D. Prove thet [tex]f(z)[/tex] is constant on D
 
OK, now I follow what you're trying to do.
in order for [tex]\frac {du}{dy} u(x,y) = - 2*i*\frac {dv}{dx}v(x,y)[/tex]
f(z) has to be constand on D
I think you're waving your hands here. You have established from the given conditions that u(x, y) = 0, so what you have is (with derivatives changed to partial derivatives):
[tex]- 2*i*\frac {\partial}{\partial x}v(x,y) = 0[/tex]
This says that v(x, y) = g(x) + C, where g is a function of x alone.

From your Cauchy-Riemann equations, what can you say about
[tex]\frac {\partial}{\partial y}v(x,y)[/tex]?
 
thanks for the reply.

[tex]\frac {\partial}{\partial y} v(x,y) = 0[/tex] by the riemann eq.

so this says that

v(x,y) = g(y) + C

which is a contradiction to your first statement and hence

v(x,y) = C

does this make sense?

thanks!
 
ok but doesn't that show that f(z) - conj(f(z)) is constant on D. how do I tie this into f(z) alone?
 
squaremeplease said:
ok but doesn't that show that f(z) - conj(f(z)) is constant on D. how do I tie this into f(z) alone?

No, it shows that f(z) is constant on D. Recall that you defined f(z) = f(x,y) = u(x,y) + i*v(x,y) back in your original post.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K