Undergrad Is fine tuning maximized complexity?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of fine-tuning of the constants of nature and whether this fine-tuning is necessary for maximizing complexity in the universe. Participants argue that the notion of fine-tuning suggests a limitation in our theoretical frameworks rather than an inherent improbability of nature. It is emphasized that while the constants may allow for life as we know it, they do not preclude the existence of other forms of life. The relationship between complexity and entropy is explored, with the idea that greater complexity could lead to higher entropy through more possible states. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for a clearer definition of complexity and its implications in understanding the universe.
friend
Messages
1,448
Reaction score
9
It is often argued that the constants of nature are so finely tuned for life, that the slightest change to them would disallow life. Is this the same as saying that they are what is required to maximize complexity in the world?
 
  • Like
Likes davidge
Physics news on Phys.org
friend said:
It is often argued that the constants of nature are so finely tuned for life, that the slightest change to them would disallow life.
Repeated often, but wrong.

In addition, different parameters or laws could lead to different kinds of intelligent entities.
friend said:
Is this the same as saying that they are what is required to maximize complexity in the world?
Define complexity.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
friend said:
It is often argued that the constants of nature are so finely tuned for life, that the slightest change to them would disallow life. Is this the same as saying that they are what is required to maximize complexity in the world?

In my eyes "fine tuning" is a statement of the theoretical framework and it's way of handling the parameter space rather than a statement that nature somehow is a priori improbable - a more sane view is that this is just a result of the incomplete or maybe even poor choice of explanatory framework.

/Fredrik
 
friend said:
It is often argued that the constants of nature are so finely tuned for life, that the slightest change to them would disallow life. Is this the same as saying that they are what is required to maximize complexity in the world?
No. Finetuning is often a hint that the underlying theory is missing a key assumption. Take for instance the epicykel theory in geocentric theories of the solar system. Those are highly finetuned, but this doesn't say anything about the complexity of our solar system; it says something about the completity of the epicykel theory.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
mfb said:
Repeated often, but wrong.
Yes. That paper deserves definitely more attention. Especially from creationists :P
 
mfb said:
Define complexity.
I think things are more complex when there are more ways of combining things. I suppose this allows more possible states than otherwise. So does this mean that complexity allows there to be more entropy than otherwise? More possible states mean more entropy, right?
 
A universe with more black holes (e. g. stronger gravity or weaker strong interaction) would have a much higher entropy.
 
friend said:
It is often argued that the constants of nature are so finely tuned for life, that the slightest change to them would disallow life.
What they usually omit to say is that it would disallow life as we know it. Nobody ever presented evidence that it would disallow any kind of life.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke
friend said:
I think things are more complex when there are more ways of combining things. I suppose this allows more possible states than otherwise. So does this mean that complexity allows there to be more entropy than otherwise? More possible states mean more entropy, right?
Entropy is related to (the lack of) order. Complexity is related to organization. Order and organization are not the same. Life is an organized disorder. See the Appendix in https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.08341 .
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K