Is Gravitational Time Dilation Symmetrical Like Velocity-Based Time Dilation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter johann1301
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitational
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of gravitational time dilation compared to inertial (velocity-based) time dilation. Participants explore whether gravitational time dilation is symmetrical or asymmetrical, and how this relates to the observations made by observers in different gravitational fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that astronauts observe time on Earth as moving slower due to gravitational time dilation, and questions whether observers on Earth would see time on the spacecraft moving faster or slower.
  • Another participant asserts that inertial time dilation is symmetric, while gravitational time dilation is not, indicating that one observer sees the other's time moving slower, while the other sees it moving faster.
  • A participant queries if the term "asymmetric" can be used to describe gravitational time dilation, seeking a precise terminology to differentiate it from inertial time dilation.
  • One response affirms that gravitational time dilation can be described as "absolute," contrasting it with the "relative" nature of time dilation due to relative velocity, while also noting the small magnitude of the effect measured in microseconds.
  • Another participant adds that gravitational time dilation is asymmetric for static observers and emphasizes the complexity of separating gravitational and kinematic time dilation for arbitrary observers, which depends on specific solutions of the Einstein Field Equations (EFE).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the symmetry of gravitational time dilation compared to inertial time dilation. There is no consensus on the terminology or the implications of these differences.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining static observers and the conditions under which gravitational and kinematic time dilation can be clearly separated, which may depend on specific solutions of the EFE.

johann1301
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
Ive heard that; when astronaunts look down at civilization, they see everything as if it was going in slow motion. This makes sense becouse of gravitational time-dilation. But i wonder: if we could see up at the astronauts - and let's say they had a big civilization up there which we could see just as clear as they can see ours - would we see things up there going faster or slower?

I know that when it comes to timedilation from moving fast, then both observers observe the same thing! (time goes slower in the train for the man standing on the passing field, but time goes slower on the field for the man sitting in the train)

*I wonder if this is the case for gravitational time dilation also;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its not. Inertial Time Dilation is symmetric (both observers see the other's time moving slower), but gravitational time dilation is not (one observer will see the other's time moving slower, that observer will see the other's time moving faster).
 
Thanks;)
 
If you can say that "Inertial Time Dilation is symmetric" Can you then say that: Gravitational Time Dilation is asymmetric?

Or is there perhaps some other word that neatly explains the difference?
 
You can do this.
In other words, you can say "gravitational time dilation is absolute", as it does not depend on the frame of the observer, while "time dilation from relative velocity is relative", as it depends on the observer.

Oh, and keep in mind that
johann1301 said:
they see everything as if it was going in slow motion
is a really small effect. You can measure it with atomic clocks, and I think one year in space gives several microseconds of gravitational time dilation. In addition, no astronaut was above the low Earth orbit for more than a few days (Apollo missions). In low Earth orbit, the velocity-related time dilation dominates.
 
mfb said:
You can do this.
In other words, you can say "gravitational time dilation is absolute", as it does not depend on the frame of the observer, while "time dilation from relative velocity is relative", as it depends on the observer.

This is a little imprecise. Gravitational time dilation is asymmetric for static observers (I assume you know this). Static observers are special, non-inertial observers, and can only be unambiguously defined in special solutions of the EFE.

For two arbitrary observers, the ability to separate gravitational and kinematic time dilation in any well defined manner depends on the existence of colocated static frames - which is possible only in very restricted solutions of EFE.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K