High School Is Gravity an entropic property like Surface Tension

  • Thread starter Thread starter marees
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion explores the concept of gravity as an emergent property, similar to surface tension, suggesting that it may arise from the need to minimize disorder at particle interfaces. It posits that gravity could be a byproduct of mass or momentum rather than a fundamental force, akin to a shadow or reflection. The idea is presented that gravity manifests through the curvature of spacetime, with objects in freefall following geodesics, which are the shortest paths in this curved space. This curvature causes massive objects to appear to attract each other, though they are merely following these geodesics. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need to rethink gravity's definition in light of these emergent properties.
marees
Messages
6
Reaction score
2
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ??

What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ?

What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other*

What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think gravity may be so hard to define because it's not created/carried by a particle. It's a consequence of something else (mass, or perhaps also momentum). Like a shadow or reflexion of something else. It's a "byproduct", not an original force in it's own right.
 
marees said:
What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ?
Well, it is. What we obseve as gravity is simply the physcial manifestation of the curvature of spacetime.

Objects in freefall follow a geodesic - the shortest path through curved spacetime. Around massive objects, where curvature is high, this causes them to appear to curve toward each other, when in fact, they are simply following this shortest-path geodesic.
 
I'm not a student or graduate in Astrophysics.. Wish i were though... I was playing with distances between planets... I found that Mars, Ceres, Jupiter and Saturn have somthing in common... They are in a kind of ratio with another.. They all got a difference about 1,84 to 1,88x the distance from the previous planet, sub-planet. On average 1,845x. I thought this can be coincidential. So i took the big moons of Jupiter and Saturn to do the same thing jupiter; Io, Europa and Ganymede have a...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
483
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K