Is Gravity Really the Weakest Force in the Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FredrikJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Weak
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of gravity as the weakest fundamental force in the universe, contrasting it with other forces such as electromagnetism. Participants argue that gravity operates differently, curving space-time rather than using carrier particles like photons for electromagnetic force. The comparison of gravitational strength to other forces is deemed valid, despite differing mechanisms, with examples provided such as measuring forces in a Hydrogen atom. The conversation concludes that while gravity is indeed weak, its unique properties warrant further exploration rather than additional explanations like extra dimensions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with fundamental forces in physics
  • Knowledge of particle physics, including carrier particles
  • Basic mathematical skills for force comparison calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of general relativity and its implications for gravity
  • Study the characteristics and roles of fundamental forces in physics
  • Explore the concept of graviton and its theoretical implications
  • Investigate theories regarding extra dimensions and their relation to gravity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental forces of nature and the unique properties of gravity.

FredrikJ
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
All physicists I've heard discussing gravity to the public always mentions that it's a very weak force compared to the other forces and that no one knows why. One possible reason could be that the gravitational force is propagating in other dimensions.
As far as I know gravity works in a completely different way compared to the other forces. The other forces use carrier particles but gravity works by curving the fabric of space and time.
Aren't we comparing apples and oranges when we are comparing the strength of gravity to the strength of the other fundamental forces?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FredrikJ said:
Aren't we comparing apples and oranges when we are comparing the strength of gravity to the strength of the other fundamental forces?
I feel that it is not really for me to answer this question (others here have the actual knowledge to do so), but I would think that one can still compare the relative strength of different fundamental forces, even though these forces may be mediated by different mechanisms. In other words, I don't think this is a matter of comparing apples and oranges. Is this correct?
 
See e.g.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/victor-stenger/myths-of-physics-2-gravit_b_5718233.html

I'd say the comparison is not that bad. In theory we can measure e.g. the electric force between a proton and a neutron in a Hydrogen-atom, and do the same for gravity. Doing the math with it gives a huge difference. between the two. Of course, in GR gravity is merely an 'inertial force', but that shouldn't be a problem. Somebody on a spinning disc can also compare the centrifugal force he/she is measuring with the gravitational force she is undergoing, do the corresponding math and compare the two.
 
Of course you can compare the forces but since the mechanisms behind the forces are completely different I don’t understand why we need an answer to why the gravitational force is so much weaker than the other fundamental forces. If the gravitational force were in the same order of magnitude as the electromagnetic force in strength I think it would be an incredible coincidence.
If there was a graviton, carrying the force the same way as photons do with the electromagnetic force, I would have understood the concept of finding out what causes the forces to be so different in strength but since those forces work in a completely different way I don’t understand why we need an additional explanation, like gravity propagating in extra dimensions.
 
First, the forces are what they are, irrespective of our models. An airplane is faster than a snail, even though they are totally different objects moving in totally different ways. Yes, gravity can break your leg, but it takes a whole planet to do it. That's pretty weak.

Second, the fact that our best mathematical models of gravity don't look anything like our best mathematical models of other forces may or may not be telling us there are fundamentally different. The map is not the territory.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, DennisN, weirdoguy and 1 other person
Vanadium 50 said:
Yes, gravity can break your leg, but it takes a whole planet to do it. That's pretty weak.
That's the most vivid demonstration of the weakness of gravity I ever seen. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and weirdoguy
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K