Is Hassani's Mathematical Physics a Good Choice for Advanced Study?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Hassani's "Mathematical Physics" is recommended for advanced study in mathematical physics, particularly for physics undergraduates who have completed foundational texts like Mary Boas' "Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences." The discussion highlights that Hassani covers a broader range of topics compared to Arfken, making it a favorable choice. However, Arfken excels in specific areas such as special functions, including Bessel functions. Overall, Hassani is preferred for its comprehensive approach, despite some limitations in certain topics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of undergraduate-level physics concepts
  • Familiarity with mathematical methods in physical sciences
  • Knowledge of special functions, particularly Bessel functions
  • Experience with advanced mathematical techniques used in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Hassani's "Mathematical Physics" for a comprehensive understanding of advanced topics
  • Review Arfken's "Mathematical Methods for Physicists" for insights on special functions
  • Study properties and applications of Bessel functions in physics
  • Investigate additional mathematical physics textbooks for comparative analysis
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics undergraduates, graduate students in mathematical physics, and educators seeking comprehensive resources for advanced studies in the subject.

Someone1987
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
I have just finished my junior year as a physics undergraduate and I am looking for a mathematical physics textbook that will help me to learn about some of the more advanced areas of the subject. I have already gone through "Mathematical Methods for the Physical Sciences" by Mary Boas. I am considering buying Hassani's book and I would just like to hear some opinions on it before I spend the money. Is this book a good choice for my next text to read on the subject? I was also considering Arfken but Hassani seems to cover all the same topics plus additional ones. Any advice or suggestions is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Overall, I kike Hassani much better than Arfken, but there are some things that Arfen does better, like special functions, e.g., the properties of the various types of Bessel functions.
 

Similar threads

Intro Math Hassani's books on Mathematical Physics/Methods
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
A good way to work through Hassani's Mathematical Physics
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
8K
Applied A question about mathematics textbooks for physicists
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
Quantum An alternative route to learn mathematics for physics, the "rigorous way"
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Other Recommendation for Mathematics for Physicist and Engineers book
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Other Math Physics Resource Request: Mary L Boas Book
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Mathematical Physics for Undergrad
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Intro Physics What is the best conceptual high school physics book?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
756
Mathematical Methods Book That Uses SI Units
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Other How to select one from these two books? (Physical Mathematics)
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K