Is HealthCare.gov Secure Enough?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Security
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The security of HealthCare.gov is under significant scrutiny due to its lack of built-in security measures, as highlighted by security expert David Kennedy. He emphasized that the website was developed without adequate security considerations, making it a prime target for hackers. Reports of serious security breaches, including compromised personal information, further underscore the vulnerabilities of the site. The government's approach to transparency and security has also been criticized, suggesting that without addressing these issues, the problems will only escalate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of web security principles
  • Familiarity with the role of white hat hackers
  • Knowledge of data privacy regulations
  • Awareness of government IT project management practices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research best practices for secure web development
  • Learn about vulnerability assessment tools and techniques
  • Explore data protection laws relevant to online platforms
  • Investigate case studies of successful government IT projects
USEFUL FOR

Web developers, cybersecurity professionals, government IT officials, and anyone involved in online security and privacy management will benefit from this discussion.

Messages
19,911
Reaction score
10,928
What does everyone think about the security concerns over the website? It appears to be in question. It certainly will be a major target for hackers and so far the website doesn't have a good track record.

"When you develop a website, you develop it with security in mind. And it doesn't appear to have happened this time," said David Kennedy, a so-called "white hat" hacker who tests online security by breaching websites. He testified on Capitol Hill about the flaws of HealthCare.gov last week.

"When you look at the site itself, it could be really good. It could do really well. They're just not building the security into the site itself," said Kennedy. "Putting your information on there is definitely a risk."

http://www.cnbc.com/id/101225308
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Hmmm ... little or no security designed into the site, no payment back end to process premiums, using a contractor with a dodgy record of performance to implement the site, it's almost like healthcare.gov was designed to fail.

The government has a different concept of security. It wants to keep all sorts of things secret when it deals with the public at large, but it grows suspicious if the public at large wants to retain a modicum of privacy from the intrusions of government.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
43K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
17K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
6K