Is information destroyed when someone dies?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlie G
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Information
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether information, particularly memories stored in the brain, is destroyed upon death. Participants explore the implications of this question from both scientific and philosophical perspectives, considering the nature of information, memory storage, and the potential for future technologies that could preserve or extract memories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Philosophical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that memories are stored in neuronal connections, and capturing these connections before deterioration could theoretically preserve them, though this remains highly speculative.
  • Others argue that the concept of information being destroyed is complex, with references to cosmological principles and the conservation of information in a Newtonian universe.
  • A participant suggests that death may contradict the idea that information cannot be destroyed, raising the possibility of information leaving the body in the form of a soul.
  • Some contributions emphasize that information loss occurs even in living individuals due to memory distortion and forgetting.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of black holes on information loss, with references to Hawking radiation and the controversy surrounding whether information can be lost in such scenarios.
  • One participant introduces the idea of future technologies that could mimic neuronal connections, potentially allowing for the preservation of memories, likening it to concepts found in science fiction.
  • Another participant mentions the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and its implications for measuring information in a quantum context, suggesting that the prevailing theories of quantum mechanics involve inherent randomness and information loss.
  • There is a mention of the philosophical implications of erasing information and its potential violation of time reversal symmetry, as well as discussions about entropy and the theoretical limits of information manipulation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains multiple competing views regarding the nature of information and memory loss upon death. Participants express differing opinions on whether information is truly destroyed and the implications of this for both physics and philosophy. No consensus is reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of current understanding of memory storage and the technology required to preserve or extract memories. The discussion also touches on unresolved questions about the nature of information in both classical and quantum contexts.

Charlie G
Messages
115
Reaction score
0
I was curious if, when someone dies, are the informetion, such as memories, stored in the brain lost? Is it possible to extract that information without somehow bringing life back into the person?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How exactly information and memories are stored in the brain is still the subject of much study, but it's basically the neuronal connections.

If you could (magically) capture the state of connections before anything started to deteriorate (probably minutes), you might be able to (magically) preserve them. But capturing them and understanding them are two VERY different things.

Don't hold your breath. Or your great-grand-children's breath(s).
 
it will not destroy any physical laws. but we need technology.
 
That was a refreshing thought Charlie, thanks...
 
Thanks for the replies, that would be a pretty convenient technology if we could probe the memories of the dead, definitely be a help to crime investigations.

The reason I asked the question was to know if death really contradicts that information cannot be destroyed, if it does, then wouldn't the information have to leave the body somehow or another, perhaps in the form of a soul?
 
Charlie G said:
Thanks for the replies, that would be a pretty convenient technology if we could probe the memories of the dead, definitely be a help to crime investigations.

The reason I asked the question was to know if death really contradicts that information cannot be destroyed, if it does, then wouldn't the information have to leave the body somehow or another, perhaps in the form of a soul?

This is more a question of philosophy than physics.
 
Sorry about that, but anyway is information "destroyed" when someone or something dies?
 
Charlie G said:
Sorry about that, but anyway is information "destroyed" when someone or something dies?

No. "Information being destroyed" has a somewhat different meaning in cosmological circles.

In a Newtonian universe, every particle and ray in the universe can have its position and velocity - in principle - measured to an arbitary level of accuracy. You could - again, in principle - take the sum total data of every particle's position and movement in the entire universe at any moment in time, and reverse the process, and trace it all the way back to the Big Bang.

It also means that every atom of every neuron of a decomposed brain in a coffin could be traced backwards and the living, thinking brain could be recreated.

That is one of the ways of thinking about conservation of information.


In a black hole however, cause and effect is lost. You cannot trace particles backwards through time and recover the information - even in principle. It is lost forever.
 
Charlie G said:
Sorry about that, but anyway is information "destroyed" when someone or something dies?

Yes, the information is lost. Even for alive people the memory changes and something gets forgotten, something gets distorted. And dieing destroys the information. That is why they kill for "knowing " too much.

Bob.
 
  • #10
Thanks for the help everyone.
 
  • #11
Bob_for_short said:
That is why they kill for "knowing " too much.

Bob.

interesting viewpoint
 
  • #12
Thanks for clearing up the information loss idea for me Dave.
 
  • #13
When we find out the technology that can mimic the neuronal connections and impulses for our different senses (touch, sight, etc) we can produce a perfect virtual reality possible ('Perfect' is relative - it is used to mean that the user should not be able to distinguish between the reality and the virtuality ). If that becomes possible, if that future-perfect our technology comes true, we would then easily "decode" the neural signals and connections in the brain so that a person's memory is preserved ! Well, having memory banks might seem like science fiction today, but its not altogether rubbish to give it a thought too ! :)

P.S: Any resemblances to Hollywood flick 'The Matrix' is purely coincidental :)

>> For more science/physics/technology/gadget related news turn on to my personal website http://www.spaceboy.in"

Regards,
Space Boy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
Memory banks would be pretty cool. When your older and want to relive some of the good times in your life you could just take a trip to the memory bank and have the forgotten or blurry memories put right back into your mind.
 
  • #15
DaveC426913 said:
In a Newtonian universe, every particle and ray in the universe can have its position and velocity - in principle - measured to an arbitary level of accuracy. You could - again, in principle - take the sum total data of every particle's position and movement in the entire universe at any moment in time, and reverse the process, and trace it all the way back to the Big Bang.

Don't forget to mention that the universe is not actually Newtonian, that it's not possible to measure position and velocity to an arbitrary level of precision due to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (because they don't exist in precise states but rather a superposition of probable states), and that the prevailing theory of QM assumes an element of randomness in everything that does cause information loss!

'course, that's just the prevailing theory.

This discussion reminds me of the field of acousta-archeology (or something like that..can't remember the precise word for it) where people analyze the surface of ancient clay pots to search for vibrational patterns caused by people's voices while they were hardening, and then play back the sounds like a record
 
  • #16
Unitary time evolution implies that information can never be lost. Even Hawking's idea that maybe information could get lost if you throw something in a black hole was hugely controversial and eventually Hawking had to concede that it probably is not true.

So, even if someone would commit suicide by throwing himself in a black hole all the information stored in his brain would still come out of the black hole in a scrambled way hidden in the Hawking radiation.

To see what it problematic with being able to erase information, suppose information stored in someone's brain could just be erased in an irreversible way without even the theoretical possibility of retrieving it. Then that implies that under a time evolution more than one possible state containing a brain will be mapped to the same final state, thus making it impossible from the final state to decide what the initial state was.

This would therefore violate time reversal symmetry. Also, you could lower the entropy of a system. You can construct a Maxwell's Demon that manipulates a system, making it less random but then it ends up storing a lot of random information in its memory. If you could just erase all this information without the rest of the universe being affected by it, then you would have lowered the entropy of the universe. This then means that you can convert heat to work with 100% efficiency.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
896
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
927
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K