Is It a Histogram or a Bar Diagram?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter srfriggen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Type
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
srfriggen
Messages
304
Reaction score
7
If you count the frequency of letters in a message, then have one axis with letters and another with numbers, is that a histogram or a bar graph or something different still?

Screen Shot 2018-09-10 at 7.39.59 PM.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-9-10_19-38-2.png
    upload_2018-9-10_19-38-2.png
    25.5 KB · Views: 514
  • Screen Shot 2018-09-10 at 7.39.59 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-09-10 at 7.39.59 PM.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 798
  • Screen Shot 2018-09-10 at 7.39.59 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-09-10 at 7.39.59 PM.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 504
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I see why it is not a bar chart, but do histograms have to have numbers along both axes? In the wiki article is states, A histogram is an accurate representation of the distribution of numerical data." Do the letters of the alphabet count as "numerical data?"
 
I don't mean to be a stickler but I am submitting something (a lesson plan) for a prize and I know it will be scrutinized.
 
Hello,

Does anyone else have any insight. I am submitting something to be published and don't want to use the wrong word. I have now played it safe and called it a "bar chart", but I feel there is a case for Histogram as the alphabet is ordered and can be put in 1-1 correspondence with the Integers, so they can act as a number axis with an interval of 1.

From wiki: "A histogram is an accurate representation of the distribution of numerical data."
 
I vote for histogram. Here is a definition that does not contain the phrase "numerical data".

If you are looking for "publishable quality" then there are more significant things to address with your graphs (assuming the images are your final effort). Labels for all axes, graph title, color scheme, elimination of chartjunk to start.

Here is a nice presentation that seems generally relevant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and mfb
lewando said:
I vote for histogram. Here is a definition that does not contain the phrase "numerical data".

If you are looking for "publishable quality" then there are more significant things to address with your graphs (assuming the images are your final effort). Labels for all axes, graph title, color scheme, elimination of chartjunk to start.

Here is a nice presentation that seems generally relevant.
When we scroll almost to the end of the ppt link in your "Here" hyperlink, the author discusses "Graphs that are not graphs", shows a chart with category versus numerical values, and calls this type a "bar diagram". So that's how you might call yours in general if you want.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu