Yoni
- 65
- 1
Can't it just be planets, asteroids, dust or gas which do not emit enough light to reach us?
The discussion revolves around the nature of dark matter, exploring various hypotheses and models regarding its composition and properties. Participants examine potential candidates for dark matter, including MACHOs and WIMPs, and discuss the implications of these models in the context of astrophysical observations.
Participants express a range of views on the nature of dark matter, with no consensus on its exact composition or the validity of different models. Disagreement exists regarding the roles of MACHOs and WIMPs, as well as the implications of gravitational lensing and the interactions of dark matter.
Limitations include the unresolved status of various hypotheses regarding dark matter candidates and the dependence on observational data that may not fully account for all variables involved.
mgb_phys said:MACHOS are massive compact halo objects, large bits of rock, black holes, dead stars that are too cool to detect.
I think they are pretty much ruled out as the source of all the dark matter, if there were enough of them we would see them as lensing effects as they pass in front of distant visible objects.
mgb_phys said:I imagine you just observe a large number of distant galaxies and look for short term variations in their brightness. From the rate of transient events you can work out the density of objects in the halo, although probably not anything about the halo object.
granpa said:so you use the rotation curve of the galaxy. that makes sense.
taylaron said:So let me get this straight Mathman, Dark Matter doesn't interact at all with any charged subatomic particles? What about Neutrinos?
-no wonder why none of our instruments will detect it.
I sure hope CERN turns something up.
taylaron said:What is the relationship between dark matter and dark energy? despite matter is a form of energy...