The discussion centers on the concept of telepathy and the potential for technology to read thoughts, referencing works by Michio Kaku and Richard Feynman. Participants debate the feasibility of machines interpreting brain signals, suggesting that while technology may advance, true telepathy as a human ability remains unlikely. The conversation also touches on the distinction between machine-assisted thought reading and the traditional notion of telepathy, concluding that beliefs in telepathy may indicate paranoia rather than a mental disorder.
PREREQUISITESIndividuals interested in the intersection of technology and psychology, particularly those exploring the implications of brain-computer interfaces, mental health professionals, and enthusiasts of science fiction narratives.
It's not clear what you mean.fxdung said:It is seem to me some books of Michio Kaku and Feynman say that when technology develope enough,one can make a machine to read the thinking of people.Why if someone thinks that:scientist possibly can read his thinking,then he is said to be mental disorder?
Is it madness if someone say that telepathy is possible?
Well, it's certainly not impossible but I find it very doubtful. Anyway, I'm sure it isn't going to happen in my lifetime so I don't really care.fxdung said:I mean a machine at distance, emits(eg laser ray) onto the head and absorbs signal from the head.Through it they can read the thinking.Is it possible?