Is it Necessary to Keep Zero Columns in an Augmented Matrix?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pondzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Columns Zero
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the treatment of an all-zero column in an augmented matrix, specifically whether it can be removed and the implications of doing so on the corresponding variable. Participants explore the relevance of such a variable in the context of systems of equations and the nature of its inclusion in the coefficient matrix.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that an all-zero column indicates that the corresponding variable is not important and can be deleted without affecting the system of equations.
  • Others question how a variable that does not influence the system could be included in the coefficient matrix initially, suggesting it may be a "ghost variable."
  • A specific augmented matrix is presented, and participants discuss the implications of the all-zero column on the solutions of the system, raising multiple statements regarding the values of k and the nature of solutions.
  • One participant suggests that if a variable is arbitrary, it may be possible to delete its corresponding column, while another argues that doing so would necessitate renaming subsequent variables, which could lead to confusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the all-zero column can be deleted and the consequences of such an action. There is no consensus on the necessity of retaining the column or the implications for the variable it represents.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity regarding the initial inclusion of the variable in the matrix and the potential impact of removing it on the naming and interpretation of other variables.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in linear algebra, particularly those studying systems of equations and matrix theory, may find this discussion relevant.

pondzo
Messages
168
Reaction score
0
If you have an augmented matrix and one column in your matrix is all zero (but not the answer column) are you able to 'delete' the all zero column and the corresponding variable? Because when you write out the equations, the co-efficient's of the variable corresponding to the all zero column are of course, all zero. Doesn't this mean that that variable is not important in these equations, and that no other variables are dependent upon this variable.

And on another note, can it even be considered a variable since nothing is dependent on this 'variable' and it can take any value without affecting it at all.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A more basic question is this: if you have a 'variable' which is not used in your system of equations, how did this 'variable' become included in the coefficient matrix in the first place?

I believe an example of what you are talking about is needed for clarification.
 
Yeah that's what i was wondering my self. how did this variable even get incorporated into the matrix if it doesn't affect it. its almost as if the variable doesn't exist, ghost variable?

Any way the question was;

$$
\begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & | & 0\\
0 & 0 & 6 & 3 & 1 & | & π\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 3 & | & 7\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & k^2 - 1 & | &0
\end{pmatrix}
$$

which statement is correct;
A) The only values for k in which there are infinitely many solns are k=1 and k=-1
B) when k=1 or -1 there are no solutions
C) There are always infinitely many solutions
D) when k=1 or -1 there is a unique solution
E) when k≠1 or -1 there are no solutions

I thought it was between either A or C but i wasnt sure if an all zero column meant infinite solutions (in which case it would be C) or whether the all zero column could be excluded (in which case it would be A).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dont know why that matrix didnt come out right, but its meant to be an augmented matrix, hopefully you can see it anyway.

1,0,0,0,0|0
0,0,6,3,1|π
0,0,0,4,3|7
0,0,0,0,k2-1|0
 
I fixed your LaTeX in post #3. It wasn't displaying correctly because you had a [ sup ] tag in it. These BB tags aren't compatible with LaTeX.

Also, you were missing an & after the vertical bar.

With regard to your question, the system it came from must have looked like this:
x1 = 0
6x3 + 3x4 + x5 = ##\pi##
etc.

x2 doesn't appear in the system, which means it is arbitrary.
 
Thanks for the edit.

And If X2 is arbitrary does that mean we can 'delete' its all zero column and X2? Or must we leave the matrix as is?
 
I would leave the column in. If you delete it, the effect is to change the names of all variables after the deleted column, with the old x3 becoming x2, the old x4 becoming x3, and so on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K