Is it ok to be satisfied?(non-ambitious)

  • Thread starter Thread starter superweirdo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the moral obligations individuals feel towards societal issues and whether it is acceptable to prioritize personal ambitions over helping others. Participants debate the balance between self-fulfillment and social responsibility, with some arguing that individuals should contribute to improving their communities, while others assert that personal happiness and pursuits should take precedence. The conversation references philosophical perspectives, including the idea that societal expectations can be burdensome and that individuals should define their own goals. There is a recognition of the emotional fulfillment that comes from helping others, yet also an acknowledgment that not everyone feels compelled to do so. The tension between personal ambition and societal duty is a recurring theme, with various viewpoints on how one can navigate these responsibilities without sacrificing personal aspirations.
  • #31
morals are relative
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Are you intending that if you see other people killing their daughter if they are born when they were wanting a son, you wouldn't complain? Ofcourse, morals are relative but there are common principle. Something that every religion shares. Something that all society inherits. It is helping people. You don't have to dedicate your life to it, but in hte list of to do things in your life, there should one that would improve this world in one perspective.
 
  • #33
superweirdo said:
Are you intending that if you see other people killing their daughter if they are born when they were wanting a son, you wouldn't complain? Ofcourse, morals are relative but there are common principle. Something that every religion shares. Something that all society inherits. It is helping people. You don't have to dedicate your life to it, but in hte list of to do things in your life, there should one that would improve this world in one perspective.


Well I can't actually see them doing it, but the ancient Athenians (cf. "The Glory that was Greece") used to expose surplus daughters on a hillside. They could kid themselves about this (Mary Renault has a nice exposition of this in one of her novels), but yeah, it was murder. Does it make me hate Pericles, Socrates and all them? The former was in a position to ban the practice and the latter could have preached against it, but neither AFIK did one single thing or ever expressed any disapproval about it.
 
  • #34
I have no idea what you are talking about.
 
  • #35
superweirdo, do you want to change to world by being a philosopher instead?

You can continue philosophizing during your life as a table tennis player. One does not have to come before the other.
 
  • #36
Actually, I was thinking about changing the educational system, which would ofcourse take some power but if I can make improve the educational system enough, everyone will be ambitious.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K