Is it possible? If so, provide an example. If not, prove it

  • Thread starter Thread starter rollinthedeep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of a continuous function g: Q x Q --> R that satisfies specific conditions, including g(0,0)=0 and g(1,1)=1, while also asserting that there are no x,y in Q such that g(x,y)=1/2. The subject area involves concepts from real analysis and properties of functions defined on rational numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of defining a function on rational numbers and question the relevance of the two-variable aspect of the problem. Some suggest simplifying the function to one variable, while others provide counterexamples to illustrate the challenges posed by the rational domain.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various perspectives on the problem. Some have provided counterexamples and rephrased the question to facilitate understanding. There is an ongoing exploration of whether a proof can be established beyond counterexamples, indicating a productive dialogue.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of rational numbers in analysis and reference the intermediate value theorem, suggesting that the problem may challenge conventional assumptions about continuity and value attainment in the context of rational functions.

rollinthedeep
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A continuous function g: Q x Q --> R such that g(0,0)=0 and g(1,1)=1, but there does not exist any x,y\in Q such that g(x,y)=1/2

Homework Equations


Mean value theorem?

The Attempt at a Solution


I want to say no, because I'm sure there's something going on because the domain is not R x R...but I can't put my finger on it. Any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if I say something meaningful here, but first of all:
- may we first think of a [tex]\mathbb{Q} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/tex] application ? It looks simpler and it could provide a useful mind training.

So that, if I let [tex]g(x)=(x+ \pi)[/tex], there's no way to make [tex]g(x)= {1 \over 2}[/tex].

[tex]\pi[/tex] is irrational, it has infinite figures, so there's no way to make a rational x to cancel out all the decimals of [tex]\pi[/tex].
 
I think the whole two-variables thing is a bit of a red herring, so to make things a bit more transparent, rephrase the question by letting g(x,y)=f((x+y)/2).

We're after f:Q-->R with f(0)=0 and f(1)=1, and no x with f(x)=1/2. We can actually do much better and have function Q-->Q. This is an exercise in showing that rational numbers are rubbish for analysis: it's a counterexample to the intermediate value theorem for Q.

Here's a clue: what's the square root of 1/2?
 
henry_m said:
I think the whole two-variables thing is a bit of a red herring, so to make things a bit more transparent, rephrase the question by letting g(x,y)=f((x+y)/2).

We're after f:Q-->R with f(0)=0 and f(1)=1, and no x with f(x)=1/2. We can actually do much better and have function Q-->Q. This is an exercise in showing that rational numbers are rubbish for analysis: it's a counterexample to the intermediate value theorem for Q.

Here's a clue: what's the square root of 1/2?

[tex]1 \over \sqrt2[/tex]

Let me say:[tex]f(x) = x^2[/tex]

[tex]f(0) = 0[/tex]
[tex]f(1) = 1[/tex]
[tex]f(x) = 1/2 , x[/tex] is irrational
 
Is there a way to prove it beyond just giving a counterexample?
 
A counterexample is how you prove a general statement is NOT true.
 
But it's not a general statement. It says to give an example if it is possible...so not for all, just there exists...don't I have to do more to prove it isn't possible at all?
 
Nevermind, I read it wrong. Thanks so much for your help!
 
Thread locked.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K