News Is it possible in this world to create a meritocracy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter avant-garde
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of a true meritocracy in society, questioning whether capitalism can be reformed to eliminate flaws like nepotism and unequal opportunities. Participants argue that while capitalism may resemble a meritocracy, it often rewards individuals based on luck or connections rather than merit. The prevalence of trust fund beneficiaries and nepotism undermines the idea that everyone has an equal chance to succeed. Additionally, the conversation highlights that true meritocracy would require equal upward and downward mobility, which is not present in current systems. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the belief that a perfect meritocracy is unattainable due to inherent human behaviors and societal structures.
  • #31
j93 said:
This is where the focus of the thread went wrong. The chinese example is an awful one
Perhaps you have a larger point; I've not followed the entire thread. But the Chinese example clearly refutes:
j93 said:
...
Downward Mobility is necessary because it shows that nepotism is not affecting the system and it allows for upward mobility.
It is simply not true that some people must lose for others to prosper. It may work out that way, it often has, but under free societies it overwhelmingly does not.

because it has more to do with the loosening of communism to allow some capitalism in that country ie this country was hurting itself and used its resources awfully like North Korea currently is.
Agreed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 235 ·
8
Replies
235
Views
23K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
31
Views
9K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K