Ahmadinejad's speech at Durban II

  • News
  • Thread starter superwolf
  • Start date
  • #1
176
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

The following is the speech of the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at the Durban Review Conference on racism in Geneva on April 20.

Mr. Chairman, honorable secretary general of the United Nations, honorable United Nations high commissioner for human rights, Ladies and gentleman:

We have gathered in the follow-up to the Durban conference against racism and racial discrimination to work out practical mechanisms for our holy and humanitarian campaigns.

Over the last centuries, humanity has gone through great sufferings and pains. In the Medieval Ages, thinkers and scientists were sentenced to death. It was then followed by a period of slavery and slave trade. Innocent people were taken captive in their millions and separated from their families and loved ones to be taken to Europe and America under the worst conditions. A dark period that also experienced occupation, lootings and massacres of innocent people.

Many years passed by before nations rose up and fought for their liberty and freedom and they paid a high price for it. They lost millions of lives to expel the occupiers and establish independent and national governments. However, it did not take long before power grabbers imposed two wars in Europe which also plagued a part of Asia and Africa. Those horrific wars claimed about a hundred million lives and left behind massive devastation. Had lessons been learnt from the occupations, horrors and crimes of those wars, there would have been a ray of hope for the future.

The victorious powers called themselves the conquerors of the world while ignoring or down treading upon rights of other nations by the imposition of oppressive laws and international arrangements.

Ladies and gentlemen, let us take a look at the UN Security Council which is one of the legacies of World War I and World War II. What was the logic behind their granting themselves the veto right? How can such logic comply with humanitarian or spiritual values? Would it not be inconformity with the recognized principles of justice, equality before the law, love and human dignity? Would it not be discrimination, injustice, violations of human rights or humiliation of the majority of nations and countries?

The council is the highest decision-making world body for safeguarding international peace and security. How can we expect the realization of justice and peace when discrimination is legalized and the origin of the law is dominated by coercion and force rather than by justice and the rights?

Coercion and arrogance is the origin of oppression and wars. Although today many proponents of racism condemn racial discrimination in their words and their slogans, a number of powerful countries have been authorized to decide for other nations based on their own interests and at their own discretion and they can easily violate all laws and humanitarian values as they have done so.

Following World War II, they resorted to military aggression to make an entire nation homeless under the pretext of Jewish suffering and they sent migrants from Europe, the United States and other parts of the world in order to establish a totally racist government in occupied Palestine. And, in fact, in compensation for the dire consequences of racism in Europe, they helped bring to power the most cruel and repressive racist regime in Palestine.

The Security Council helped stabilize the occupying regime and supported it in the past 60 years giving them a free hand to commit all sorts of atrocities. It is all the more regrettable that a number of Western governments and the United States have committed themselves to defending those racist perpetrators of genocide while the awakened-conscience and free-minded people of the world condemn aggression, brutalities and the bombardment of civilians in Gaza. The supporters of Israel have always been either supportive or silent against the crimes.

Dear friends, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen. What are the root causes of the US attacks against Iraq or the invasion of Afghanistan?

Was the motive behind the invasion of Iraq anything other than the arrogance of the then US administration and the mounting pressures on the part of the possessors of wealth and power to expand their sphere of influence seeking the interests of giant arms manufacturing companies affecting a noble culture with thousands of years of historical background, eliminating the potential and practical threats of Muslim countries against the Zionist regime or to control and plunder the energy resources of the Iraqi people?

Why, indeed, almost a million people were killed and injured and a few more millions were displaced? Why, indeed, the Iraqi people have suffered enormous losses amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars? And why was billions of dollars imposed on the American people as the result of these military actions? Was not the military action against Iraq planned by the Zionists and their allies in the then US administration in complicity with the arms manufacturing countries and the possessors of wealth? Did the invasion of Afghanistan restore peace, security and economic wellbeing in the country?

The United States and its allies not only have failed to contain the production of drugs in Afghanistan, but the cultivation of narcotics has multiplied in the course of their presence. The basic question is that what was the responsibility and the job of the then US administration and its allies?

Did they represent the countries of the world? Have they been mandated by them? Have they been authorized by the people of the world to interfere in all parts of the globe, of course mostly in our region? Are not these measures a clear example of egocentrism, racism, discrimination or infringement upon the dignity and independence of nations?

Ladies and gentlemen, who is responsible for the current global economic crisis? Where did the crisis start from? From Africa, Asia or from the United States in the first place then spreading across Europe and their allies?

For a long time, they imposed inequitable economic regulations by their political power on the international economy. They imposed a financial and monetary system without a proper international oversight mechanism on nations and governments that played no role in repressive trends or policies. They have not even allowed their people to oversea or monitor their financial policies. They introduced all laws and regulations in defiance of all moral values only to protect the interests of the possessors of wealth and power.

They further presented a definition for market economy and competition that denied many of the economic opportunities that could be available to other countries of the world. They even transferred their problems to others while the waves of crisis lashed back plaguing their economies with thousands of billions of dollars in budget deficit. And today, they are injecting hundreds of billions of dollars of cash from the pockets of their own people and other nations into the failing banks, companies and financial institutions making the situation more and more complicated for their economy and their people. They are simply thinking about maintaining power and wealth. They could not care any less about the people of the world and even their own people.

Mr. President, Ladies and gentlemen, Racism is rooted in the lack of knowledge concerning the root of human existence as the selected creature of God. It is also the product of his deviation from the true path of human life and the obligations of mankind in the world of creation, failing to consciously worship God, not being able to think about the philosophy of life or the path to perfection that are the main ingredients of divine and humanitarian values which have restricted the horizon of human outlook making transient and limited interests, the yardstick for his action. That is why evil's power took shape and expanded its realm of power while depriving others from enjoying equitable and just opportunities of development.

The result has been the making of an unbridled racism that is posing the most serious threats against international peace and has hindered the way for building peaceful coexistence in the entire world. Undoubtedly, racism is the symbol of ignorance which has deep roots in history and it is, indeed, the sign of frustration in the development of human society.

It is, therefore, crucially important to trace the manifestations of racism in situations or in societies where ignorance or lack of knowledge prevails. This increasing general awareness and understanding towards the philosophy of human existence is the principle struggle against such manifestations, and reveals the truth that human kind centers on the creation of the universe and the key to solving the problem of racism is a return to spiritual and moral values and finally the inclination to worship God Almighty.

The international community must initiate collective moves to raise awareness in afflicted societies where ignorance of racism still prevails so as to bring to a halt the spread of these malicious manifestations.

Dear Friends, today, the human community is facing a kind of racism which has tarnished the image of humanity in the beginning of the third millennium.

World Zionism personifies racism that falsely resorts to religions and abuses religious sentiments to hide its hatred and ugly face. However, it is of great importance to bring into focus the political goals of some of the world powers and those who control huge economic resources and interests in the world. They mobilize all the resources including their economic and political influence and world media to render support in vain to the Zionist regime and to maliciously diminish the indignity and disgrace of this regime.

This is not simply a question of ignorance and one cannot conclude these ugly phenomena through consular campaigns. Efforts must be made to put an end to the abuse by Zionists and their political and international supporters and in respect with the will and aspirations of nations. Governments must be encouraged and supported in their fights aimed at eradicating this barbaric racism and to move towards reform in current international mechanisms.

There is no doubt that you are all aware of the conspiracies of some powers and Zionist circles against the goals and objectives of this conference. Unfortunately, there have been literatures and statements in support of Zionists and their crimes. And it is the responsibility of honorable representatives of nations to disclose these campaigns which run counter to humanitarian values and principles.

It should be recognized that boycotting such a session as an outstanding international capacity is a true indication of supporting the blatant example of racism. In defending human rights, it is primarily important to defend the rights of all nations to participate equally in all important international decision making processes without the influence of certain world powers.

And secondly, it is necessary to restructure the existing international organizations and their respective arrangements. Therefore this conference is a testing ground and the world public opinion today and tomorrow will judge our decisions and our actions.

Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen, the world is going through rapid fundamental changes. Power relations have become weak and fragile. The sound of cracks in the pillars of world systems can now be heard. Major political and economic structures are on the brink of collapse. Political and security crises are on the rise. The worsening crisis in the world economy for which there can be seen no bright prospect, demonstrates the rising tide of far-reaching global changes. I have repeatedly emphasized the need to change the wrong direction through which the world is being managed today and I have also warned of the dire consequences of any delay in this crucial responsibility.

Now in this valuable event, I would like to announce to all leaders, thinkers and to all nations of the world present in this meeting and those who have a hunger for peace and economic well-being that the unjust economic management of the world is now at the end of the road. This deadlock was inevitable since the logic of this imposed management was oppressive.

The logic of collective management of world affairs is based on noble aspirations which centers on human beings and the supremacy of the almighty God. Therefore it defies any policy or plan which goes against the influence of nations. The victory of right over wrong and the establishment of a just world system has been promised by the Almighty God and his messengers and it has been a shared goal of all human beings from different societies and generations in the course of history. Realization of such a future depends on the knowledge of creation and the belief of the faithful.

The making of a global society is in fact the accomplishment of a noble goal held in the establishment of a common global system that will be run with the participation of all nations of the world in all major decision making processes and the definite root to this sublime goal.

Scientific and technical capacities as well as communication technology have created a common and widespread understanding of the world society and has provided the necessary ground for a common system. Now it is upon all intellectuals, thinkers and policy makers in the world to carry out their historical responsibility with a firm belief in this definite root.

I also want to lay emphasis on the fact that Western liberalism and capitalism has reached its end since it has failed to perceive the truth of the world and humans as they are.

It has imposed its own goals and directions on human beings. There is no regard for human and divine values, justice, freedom, love and brotherhood and it has based living on intense competition, securing individual and cooperative material interest.

Now we must learn from the past by initiating collective efforts in dealing with present challenges and in this connection, and as a closing remark, I wish to draw your kind attention to two important issues:

Firstly, it is absolutely possible to improve the existing situation in the world. However it must be noted that this could be only achieved through the cooperation of all countries in order to get the best out of the existing capacities and resources in the world. My participation in this conference is because of my conviction to these important issues as well as to our common responsibility of defending the rights of nations vis-à-vis the sinister phenomena of racism and being with you, the thinkers of the world.

Secondly, mindful of the inefficiency of the current international political, economic and security systems, it is necessary to focus on divine and humanitarian values by referring to the true definition of human beings based upon justice and respect for the rights of all people in all parts of the world and by acknowledging the past wrong doings in the past dominant management of the world, and to undertake collective measures to reform the existing structures.

In this respect, it is crucially important to rapidly reform the structure of the Security Council, including the elimination of the discriminatory veto right and to change the current world financial and monetary systems.

It is evident that lack of understanding of the urgency for change is equivalent to the much heavier costs of delay.

Dear Friends, beware that to move in the direction of justice and human dignity is like a rapid flow in the current of a river. Let us not forget the essence of love and affection. The promised future of human beings is a great asset that may serve our purposes in keeping together to build a new world.

In order to make the world a better place full of love and blessings, a world devoid of poverty and hatred, merging the increasing blessings of God Almighty and the righteous managing of the perfect human being, let us all join hands in friendship in the fulfillment of such a new world.

I thank you Mr. President, Secretary General and all distinguished participants for having the patience to listen to me. Thank you very much.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
378
2
And here are the walkouts..

Diplomats have walked out of a UN anti-racism conference during a speech by the Iranian president in which he described Israel as "totally racist".
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8008572.stm
 
  • #3
lisab
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,887
616
Looks like even the ambassador from Clownland walked out.
 
  • #4
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
131
I am deeply ashamed that Norways foreign minister, Mr. Gahr Støre chose to remain at this scandalous conference.

He is jubilant over his own "bravery" at remaining there, in contrast to those cowardly representatives who walked out.
 
  • #5
mgb_phys
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
7,774
12
So the consensus is that Ahmadinejad doesn't like Isreal.
You don't think he was just trying to get a better deal on a timeshare in Eilat then?
 
  • #6
1,425
1
I think the decision to walk out is simply childish. One does not have to be in agreement to stay and listen.
 
  • #7
seycyrus
I think the decision to walk out is simply childish. One does not have to be in agreement to stay and listen.
To sit and listen expresses an accceptance that many did not wish to express.
 
  • #8
378
2
To sit and listen expresses an accceptance that many did not wish to express.
So, we should only listen to things that we like.
 
  • #9
seycyrus
So, we should only listen to things that we like.
I don't think Arman was going to say anything new. If so, there will be footage of it. Walking out, as a form of expression has been around for some time.

Armani made his statement. Others made a statement in reply.
 
  • #10
2,425
6
So, we should only listen to things that we like.
The point is not to refuse to listen in principle. The point is, when you know somebody, when you have listened this person already many times, when you have calmly tried to express your disagreement, and never obtain an inch of progress, after all this time has elapsed, there remains two options : violence or end of the discussion. Let us be happy that we have now an "end of discussion" and let's consider how we can avoid the other possibility.
 
  • #11
378
2
The point is not to refuse to listen in principle. The point is, when you know somebody, when you have listened this person already many times, when you have calmly tried to express your disagreement, and never obtain an inch of progress....
Then, why those clowns were there in the first place. Or, how they are different from the Iraqi who threw shoes at Bush?
 
  • #12
mgb_phys
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
7,774
12
It's theatre.

Walk out = you are Iran's enemy and you want the people back home to know it

Stay (brown skin) = you are on Iran's side or you want your electorate / the Generals back home to know you are standing upto America

Stay (white skin) = you aren't on Iran's side, but you want the electorate / the newspapers back home to know you aren't an American puppet.

Stay (very white skin) = you are from a Scandinavian country that is trying to maintain an image of being fair balanced and impartial. You really don't get paid enough for sitting through this stuff and you should bring an iPod to connect to the translation headphones.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
2,425
6
Then, why those clowns were there in the first place. Or, how they are different from the Iraqi who threw shoes at Bush?
Who says they are different ? Their difference is probably on which side they clown around, but that's not really a difference, it's just circumstances.
 
  • #14
176
0
I am deeply ashamed that Norways foreign minister, Mr. Gahr Støre chose to remain at this scandalous conference.
I think we have to listen and answer, even people like Ahmadinejad. He wants to create an "us against the rest"-mentality, and by walking out, he obtains what he wants. If we're not even willing to listen to each other, we'll never find a solution to the middle east conflicts. I don't agree that listening expresses accepting, and everyone who heard Støre answering Ahmadinejad, understand that he deeply disagrees with Iran's leader.
 
  • #15
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,916
17
He wants to create an "us against the rest"-mentality, and by walking out, he obtains what he wants.
Given your hypothesis, are you sure that "confronting him" isn't what he wants? :tongue:
 
  • #16
misgfool
Looks like even the ambassador from Clownland walked out.
What is Clownland?
 
  • #17
176
0
Given your hypothesis, are you sure that "confronting him" isn't what he wants? :tongue:
That would be the second choice, because he's not able to defend his views.
 
  • #18
1,425
1
The point is not to refuse to listen in principle. The point is, when you know somebody, when you have listened this person already many times, when you have calmly tried to express your disagreement, and never obtain an inch of progress, after all this time has elapsed, there remains two options : violence or end of the discussion. Let us be happy that we have now an "end of discussion" and let's consider how we can avoid the other possibility.
Excuse me but I don't follow. The alternative to not walking out is violence? What?!
 
  • #19
378
2
Who says they are different ?
Just putting them together so that people who walked out simply don't get defended because Ahmadinejad was at the stage (not Bush).
 
  • #20
2,425
6
Just putting them together so that people who walked out simply don't get defended because Ahmadinejad was at the stage (not Bush).
I understand your point. I myself would have thrown worse at other presidents as well, so it could not have been obvious to me.
 
  • #21
1,134
7
What is Clownland?
It must be where the person dressed as a clown came from.
 
  • #22
2,425
6
Excuse me but I don't follow. The alternative to not walking out is violence? What?!
Did you ever experience this rage one can feel when asking calmly a change of attitude for more than several years, and getting only worse in response ? If you like to get engaged in wars (as a president) or naked fights (as an individual) maybe you like this feeling of rage preparing you ideally for the combat. If you prefer to think that there is always an intelligent solution to any disagreement, this feeling is the verge of your own failure.

You know very well that politics carries heavy history. If, representing my country, I feel like I am loosing my nerves in a discussion, then I should leave the discussion, with or without apologies. I understand the responsibility and the decision made at this point. I don't necessarily approve it either. So tell us, what would you (as an individual) have done if you had had the privilege to actually be there ?
 
  • #23
2,425
6
It must be where the person dressed as a clown came from.
I thought it was also where Ahmadinejad came from actually. I thought that's exactly what it meant.
 
  • #24
misgfool
It must be where the person dressed as a clown came from.
I didn't have an ambassador in that meeting.
 
  • #25
tiny-tim
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
25,832
249
racism is not acceptable

What is Clownland?
Clownland's chief export is red noses :wink:

I think the decision to walk out is simply childish. One does not have to be in agreement to stay and listen.
So, we should only listen to things that we like.
Those countries who walked out were saying that racism is not acceptable.

Those countries who stayed were saying that racism is acceptable. :redface:
 

Related Threads for: Ahmadinejad's speech at Durban II

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
5
Replies
103
Views
13K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Top