I Is It Possible? Solving Calculus Questions with Ease

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter NODARman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
NODARman
Messages
57
Reaction score
13
TL;DR Summary
.
Hi, just wondering if that's possible in calculus.
(See the attachment)
 

Attachments

  • 166920054969935055318737542524.jpg
    166920054969935055318737542524.jpg
    37.6 KB · Views: 171
Physics news on Phys.org
NODARman said:
TL;DR Summary: .

Hi, just wondering if that's possible in calculus.
(See the attachment)
What you wrote was essentially correct. But...

In reality? No. The derivative notation ##\dfrac{d \theta }{dt}## is not actually a fraction so you cannot cancel the dt's.

However, in practice you can "cancel" the dt's. It's a similar effect to the chain rule: ##\dfrac{d \theta }{dx} = \dfrac{d \theta }{dt} \cdot \dfrac{dt}{dx}##. Again, there is no real cancellation, but it appears that way.

Mathematicians in the 1800s spent a great deal of time showing how you can treat a differential element as a fraction. Most of the time you can get away with it.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave, DaveE, vela and 1 other person
Technically the bounds on the integral need to change to ##\int_{t(0)}^{t(2\pi)}## if you are integrating wrt ##t##.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveE and topsquark
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top