Is it Possible that 1 Equals -1: A Mathematical Inquiry?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter olek1991
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the erroneous assertion that 1 equals -1, stemming from a misinterpretation of square roots and complex numbers. Participants clarify that the principal square root function is defined to yield only positive values, which invalidates the claim. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the properties of complex numbers and the implications of mathematical definitions, particularly regarding the square root function and exponentiation. Key concepts include the polar representation of complex numbers and the distinction between real and complex square roots.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their polar representation
  • Familiarity with the properties of square roots and exponentiation
  • Knowledge of mathematical functions and their definitions
  • Basic grasp of imaginary numbers, specifically the role of i in complex analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex numbers, focusing on polar coordinates and Euler's formula
  • Learn about the principal square root function and its implications in real and complex analysis
  • Explore the rules of exponentiation, particularly with non-positive bases
  • Investigate common misconceptions in mathematics, especially regarding square roots and their definitions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in the foundations of complex analysis and the properties of mathematical functions.

olek1991
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I think that I have proof of 1 being -1 and I can't find any flaw in it.
Could you please take a look?

-1=i² =>
(-1)²=(i²)² =>
1 = i^4 => take the square root both sides
1 = i²

i² = -1 v i² = 1

Thus proving
1 = -1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To confuse you a little more can you find the mistake: 2=\sqrt{4}=\sqrt{(-2)^2}=-2.
 
Yea I know those too xD
Does that mean that it is correct? (but just not used since it's crazy)

Edit: the √(-2)² is not -2, but 2 btw :P
You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²
 
Last edited:
No I meant exactly what I wrote, the root cancelling the square. We can't do this because we have defined taking the square root of a real number to be a positive value. This is called the principal square root. For the complex numbers this principal root is defined as \sqrt{z}=\sqrt{|z|}e^{i \pi/2}. In general for complex numbers it is not even true that \sqrt{zw}=\sqrt{z}\sqrt{w}.
 
a^{bc}=\left(a^b\right)^c is not generally true. For example \left(\left(-1\right)^2\right)^{\frac 1 2}\neq-1. You should be careful with this rule when the base is not a positive real number and the exponent is not an integer.
 
Cyosis said:
No I meant exactly what I wrote, the root cancelling the square. We can't do this because we have defined taking the square root of a real number to be a positive value. This is called the principal square root. For the complex numbers this principal root is defined as \sqrt{z}=\sqrt{|z|}e^{i \pi/2}. In general for complex numbers it is not even true that \sqrt{zw}=\sqrt{z}\sqrt{w}.

I really don't get that O.o
Could you dumb it down a little? (I'm a collage student)
 
We can write every complex number z in the form z=|z|e^{i \theta} with |z| the distance between z and the origin and \theta the angle between the x-axis and |z| (polar coordinates). If you have had some complex numbers you should know this representation of a complex number. From this it follows that i=e^{i \pi/2} and i^4=e^{2 \pi i}. Now taking the square root of i^4 we get \sqrt{i^4}=e^{i \pi}=-1.
 
olek1991 said:
Yea I know those too xD
Does that mean that it is correct? (but just not used since it's crazy)

Edit: the √(-2)² is not -2, but 2 btw :P
You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²

No that's not what it means, all of our mathematical foundations would be bogus if we ever said "it's true, but it's too crazy.. so it's pretty much false".
Sqrt(x) is a function (input/output relationships are unique), so given a number (perhaps 9), Sqrt(9) will map to 3.. never -3. If Sqrt(9) could be either -3 OR 3, it wouldn't be a function. Even though (-3)^2 = 9 = (3)^2, the root function is defined to take positive values and produce positive values.


Edit: the √(-2)² is not -2, but 2 btw :P
You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²

This is exactly what you kind of said.. sqrt( (-2)^2 ) is indeed 2 since (-2)^2 gives us 4, and by the definition of the function, we will get the positive possible "root" only.

"You probably meant (-2)² = √4 = 2²" You probably made some typing mistake here.. (-2)^2 = sqrt(4) = 2^2?? 4 = 2 = 4? I don't know
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
903
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
88K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K