I Is it possible to create linear acceleration using nothing but different moments of inertia beteen a wheel and axle?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter BishopBrain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of creating linear acceleration using different moments of inertia between a wheel and axle, exemplified by the character Axel from the Twisted Metal video game series. Participants explore whether Axel could move if his center of mass is aligned with the axis of rotation, noting that while he could potentially roll, he would likely flip end over end. The conversation also touches on the mechanics of a Segway, emphasizing that motorization is necessary for movement. Additionally, the analogy of a tightrope walker is used to illustrate how torque can influence movement. Ultimately, the question remains whether movement is possible without external forces if Axel's center of mass is consistently on-axis.
BishopBrain
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Is it possible to create linear acceleration using nothing but different moments of inertia beteen a wheel and axle?
The Twisted Metal video game series includes a character aptly named Axel, whose vehicle is just himself strapped to a pair of tractor wheels. This is the guy:

axel.jpg

Most of my friends assume that in real life, he probably wouldn't be able to drive anywhere unless his feet were incredibly heavy, so that gravity would apply torque as his lower half swung forward--similar mechanics to a monocycle.

But one of us claimed that even if Axel's center of mass lay perfectly on the axis of rotation of the big wheels , he would still be able to move a little bit if he were so heavy that the moment of inertia of himself was significantly greater than the moment of inertia for his wheels. Axel would still be spinning sickeningly, but his contraption could move about at least a little bit.

Is this correct? Can two very-different wheels applying torque to one another via an axle generate linear motion from friction, even in the absence of any external forces tangential to the axle? We were skeptical, but couldn't figure out how to set up the system to test the math.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If he's rigidly attached to the wheels and he can flex his body to keep his center of mass forwards of the rotation axis then sure he can roll. He'd flip end for end as he does it, though, and I'm guessing the vehicle acts more like a Segway.

Obviously Segways are possible, but you need a motor.
 
Welcome!
What are those things attached to the shoulders?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes BishopBrain
Lnewqban said:
What are those things attached to the shoulders?
Machine guns or missiles, I forget which.

Ibix said:
If he's rigidly attached to the wheels and he can flex his body to keep his center of mass forwards of the rotation axis then sure he can roll. He'd flip end for end as he does it, though, and I'm guessing the vehicle acts more like a Segway.

Obviously Segways are possible, but you need a motor.
Yes, in game he's motorized like a Segway. In-game he's also perfectly upright at all times, which is not terribly realistic...

The crux of my question is, if motorized and if his CoM is always on-axis, is movement possible for Axel. If he has a CoM off-axis, then he clearly can (in any number of ways), and I know how to draw up the free-body diagram to analyze it.
 
Last edited:
BishopBrain said:
The crux of my question is, if motorized and if his CoM is always on-axis, is movement possible for Axel.
Sure, but the wheel hubs (with him) will spin opposite to the wheels.
 
There is some similarity with a tight rope walker carrying a pole.

The walker can accelerate his center of gravity rightward or leftward by exerting torque against the pole while his feet exert a counter torque on the rope.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top