Is it possible to sketch this function without a graphing calculator?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jules18
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the function f(x) = x/[(1+3x)^(1/2)-1], exploring its graphical representation without a graphing calculator. Users confirm that the function appears linear for large x values and is undefined for x < 0. By manipulating the function using the conjugate of the denominator, a more accurate approximation is derived, revealing that as x approaches infinity, f(x) approximates to (√3/3)√x + 1/3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic manipulation and rational functions
  • Familiarity with limits and asymptotic behavior
  • Knowledge of square roots and their properties
  • Experience with graphing functions, particularly using graphing calculators like TI-83
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of rational functions and their graphs
  • Learn about asymptotic analysis and how it applies to functions
  • Explore algebraic techniques for simplifying complex fractions
  • Practice using graphing calculators to visualize functions and their behaviors
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced algebra, particularly those looking to understand the behavior of complex functions without relying solely on graphing technology.

Jules18
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
x/[(1+3x)^(1/2)-1]

I'm wondering if it's even possible to imagine what a graph of this fxn would look like, or do you definitely need a graphing calc?

When I plug it into a TI83, it ends up looking pretty linear and apparently doesn't exist when x < 0

~Jules~



PS. sorry for how messy the eq'n looks, it's difficult to type. ... (1+3x) should be under a sqrt. sign.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just by looking at it, you see that you have x in the numerator and x1/2 in the denominator. For large x, the function will roughly look like x1/2, but you can find a better approximation. After multiplying the top and bottom of the fraction by the conjugate of the denominator and doing some work on it, you get

[tex]\frac{\sqrt{3x + 1} + 1}{3} = \frac{\sqrt{3x(1 + \frac{1}{3x})} + 1}{3} = \frac{\sqrt{3x}\sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{3x}}}{3} ~+~ \frac{1}{3} = \frac{\sqrt{3}}{3}\sqrt{x} \sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{3x}} ~+~ \frac{1}{3}[/tex]

As x→∞, the larger radicand goes to 1 and has less and less effect on √x, so the function is nearly like [tex]\frac{\sqrt{3}}{3}\sqrt{x} ~+~ \frac{1}{3}[/tex]
 
thanks ^_^
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K