Is it possible to turn vacuum energy into heat

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of extracting heat from vacuum energy, exploring various theoretical approaches and implications. Participants examine concepts from thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, and cosmology, considering both practical applications and speculative ideas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the Casimir effect could create heat through magnetic attraction, suggesting a rotary system for energy generation, but notes the energy produced may be minimal.
  • Another idea involves using two plasmas that collapse into each other to absorb vacuum energy and produce heat, with a focus on a system that dissipates heat into a working fluid.
  • A third thought considers cavitation and turbulence as mechanisms for creating and absorbing vacuum energy, though concerns about energy loss due to turbulence are raised.
  • One participant asserts that vacuum energy represents the lowest energy state, arguing that heat cannot be extracted from it, while introducing the Unruh effect as a means of energy absorption from vacuum when mass is accelerated.
  • Another participant questions whether vacuum energy slows down mass acceleration akin to friction, referencing an experiment involving electrons and high temperatures.
  • One participant shares a theory that views vacuum energy as constituted by virtual particles, proposing that this could lead to violations of energy conservation at a fundamental level.
  • Another counters that vacuum energy does not necessarily violate conservation laws, attributing unexpected quantum energy appearances to non-locality in a holographic context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of competing views on the nature of vacuum energy and its potential to be converted into heat. There is no consensus on the feasibility of extracting heat from vacuum energy or the implications of various theoretical frameworks discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their ideas, including assumptions about energy loss in turbulence and the dependence on definitions of vacuum energy and conservation laws. Some concepts remain speculative and are not universally accepted.

clearwater304
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a thermodynamics project on possible future energy sources. I've decided to try and find out if you can extract heat from vacuum energy. My initial hypothesis was that by placing to plates close together creates a magnetic attraction due to the casimir effect, which would create heat do to the magnetocaloric effect. I would think that you could build a rotary system off of this to create in essence free energy, but after running through the numbers, the amount of energy produced would be very small.

My second thought would be by using two plasmas, you could have two sheets which collapse into each other, absorbing vacuum energy, producing extra heat. However, I'm looking for a system which dissipates heat directly into a working fluid.

My third thought is that perhaps, cavitation and turbulence creates more vacuum energy which is in turn absorbed by the fluid. My thought is that the work required to expand and contract a fluid would completely turn to heat. The expansion would create vacuum energy, and the compression would absorb it. However, I am almost positive there is an equation which shows you lose energy in turbulance, and perhaps this is related to the energy required to expand a fluid to "create" vacuum energy.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vacuum energy is the lowest level of the energy in the space. Heat is a flow of the photons between the higher and lower level of the energy. Therefore you can't take an energy from the lowest level of the energy.
On the other hand if the rest mass particle is accelerated in the gravitational field (vacuum) it absorbes the energy from the vacuum due to Unruh effect. As a concequence is the change in the curvature of the space because of the absorbed vacuum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect
 
Thanks for the response, the unruh effect is exactly what I needed to show tempature difference from vacuum energy absorption. My biggest question now would be, does vacuum energy slow down the acceleration of the mass like friction? The wiki page describes an experiment to accelerate an electron so that it reaches 400,000 degrees K. Could this expirement produce more energy then put into accelerate the electron?
 
There is one hypothesis that the space is an illusion created as a hologram of a mathematical matrix. The vacuum energy is a relation between information (a matrix) and it is a perfect medium creating our geometry. The quantum information is perfectly conserved even during the billions years of journey. This vacuum behaves like all medium and its refractive index shows the curvature of the space as in General Relativity.

There is also en effect like a friction. When you have a grains of a sand on the bottom of the glass of water and when it rotates it creates an image like a spiral galaxy.
The density of the vacuum is distributed like a gravitational field and it causes the effect of the Dark Matter. The mass of the galaxy is not in its centre but as the vacuum is distributed inversely proportional to the distance from a centre of the galaxy. Therefore we observe a constant velocity of the stars on each distance from the centre of the galaxy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holography
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
 
I have a similar theory in the sense that 3d space is an illusion. It would seem apperent to me that vacuum energy is not simply the by product of the energy of virtual particles, but constituated by virtual particles. The universe was formed by a fundamental virtual particle, and it is becuase of this that vacuum energy violates the conservation of energy. The reason we don't see this in the macro scale is the same reason de broglie wavelengths are very small in large objects.
 
Not necessarily violates the conservation of the energy. It seems to be because of the non-locality. In hologram the relation is on a screen and we observe it far away in a space. Therefore the quantum energy appears in a situation we do not expect. The non-locality is obvious in the holographic space.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_nonlocality
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K