Is it possible to use TR or TRCL to translate an F4 or FMESH4 tally in MCNP6.2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 19matthew89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mcnp
AI Thread Summary
Using the TR or TRCL cards to translate F4 or FMESH4 tallies in MCNP6.2 is not straightforward. The FMESH must be adjusted using its origin and axis entries rather than the TR card, which specifies the mesh's orientation and position. The discussion highlights the importance of carefully reading the manual regarding FMESH bounds and suggests testing with a small number of particles to understand the effects of origin adjustments. Concerns were raised about the complexity of translating F4 tallies, especially when cells are tilted. The conversation also touches on combining linear and rotated tallies, indicating a need for clarity on the TR card's usage.
19matthew89
Messages
46
Reaction score
12
TL;DR Summary
Is it possible to use TR card to translate a segmented or a mesh tally?
Hi everyone,
I'd like to know if it is possible to use TR or TRCL to translate an F4 or FMESH4 tally.

Let me better explain: I have a cell, centered at 0,0,0 and for this cell I set up a segmentation tally along z-axis with a series of planes orthogonal to the z-axis. Moreover, I have also set up a Cartesian mesh tally with FMESH4.
Now I'd like to translate the cell along the z-axis (and later also rotate). This can be done easily with TRCL card but may I apply the same transformation to the F4 segmented tally and FMESH4 tally that I set up for the cell at 0,0,0? so that, for instance, I do not need to define planes orthogonal to the z-axis or the mesh at different heights but such that the tallies on the translated cell inherit, somehow, the structure of the original tallies?

The section of the manual about tallies in repeated structure is mainly focused on lattices or elements of the universes and not about segmentation or meshes.

Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You don't use the TR card to move the FMESH. You use the origin and axis entries on the FMESH. That let's you specify the origin of the mesh, the x-axis of the mesh, and the orientation of the mesh y-axis relative to the x-axis. If you were doing a cylindrical mesh then you specify the z-axis of the cylinder and the location of the zero of angle around the cylinder.

Note: Read the manual about the bounds of the FMESH very carefully when you are using this feature. Try it out a few times on runs with very small number of particles. The manual is kind of confusing, at least for me, on how the bounds are affected by the origin.
 
  • Like
Likes 19matthew89
Grelbr42 said:
You don't use the TR card to move the FMESH. You use the origin and axis entries on the FMESH. That let's you specify the origin of the mesh, the x-axis of the mesh, and the orientation of the mesh y-axis relative to the x-axis. If you were doing a cylindrical mesh then you specify the z-axis of the cylinder and the location of the zero of angle around the cylinder.

Note: Read the manual about the bounds of the FMESH very carefully when you are using this feature. Try it out a few times on runs with very small number of particles. The manual is kind of confusing, at least for me, on how the bounds are affected by the origin.
Yeah! I already got in that kind of situation with the origin so now I know how to deal with that 😅 Indeed for mesh tally I already did and it was fast enough and not a big deal.
It would be more useful in the case of the of F4 tallies. With my current setup everything is anyway pretty easy but, but I'm afraid it might be a bit more bothersome when cells are going to be tilted.
 
Hi 19matthew89,

your post about the "trans" coomand was very interesting for me!
Please, could you suggest a way to combine linear and rotated tallies?

Thank you
Laura
 
lauraB said:
Hi 19matthew89,

your post about the "trans" coomand was very interesting for me!
Please, could you suggest a way to combine linear and rotated tallies?

Thank you
Laura
Hi Laura,
I don't exactly understand what you mean...
Every TR card (which has to follow a TRANS key word) is to be defined with a linear displacement vector:

TRn o1 o2 o3 xx’ yx’ zx’ xy’ yy’ zy’ xz’ yz’ zz’ m

with o1, o2, and o3 displacement vector.

Is this that you mean with "linear and rotated tallies"?

Cheers
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top