Is it possible to use TR or TRCL to translate an F4 or FMESH4 tally in MCNP6.2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 19matthew89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mcnp
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of using the TR or TRCL cards in MCNP6.2 to translate F4 or FMESH4 tallies associated with a cell in a Monte Carlo simulation. Participants explore the implications of translating and rotating tallies, particularly in relation to segmentation along the z-axis and Cartesian mesh configurations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires whether TR or TRCL can be used to translate F4 and FMESH4 tallies, expressing a desire to avoid redefining planes or mesh at different heights after translation.
  • Another participant asserts that the TR card should not be used for moving FMESH, suggesting instead the use of origin and axis entries on the FMESH to specify its position and orientation.
  • A participant shares their experience with the FMESH and acknowledges the importance of understanding the bounds as affected by the origin, indicating that while the FMESH setup was manageable, F4 tallies might present more challenges when cells are tilted.
  • One participant expresses interest in combining linear and rotated tallies, seeking clarification on how to achieve this within the context of the TR card's requirements.
  • Another participant asks for further clarification on combining linear and rotated tallies, indicating some confusion regarding the definitions and applications of the TR card.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the use of the TR card for translating tallies, with some advocating for the use of origin and axis entries instead. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to combining linear and rotated tallies.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion in the manual regarding the bounds of the FMESH and the implications of using the TR card, highlighting the need for careful consideration of these factors in practical applications.

19matthew89
Messages
46
Reaction score
12
TL;DR
Is it possible to use TR card to translate a segmented or a mesh tally?
Hi everyone,
I'd like to know if it is possible to use TR or TRCL to translate an F4 or FMESH4 tally.

Let me better explain: I have a cell, centered at 0,0,0 and for this cell I set up a segmentation tally along z-axis with a series of planes orthogonal to the z-axis. Moreover, I have also set up a Cartesian mesh tally with FMESH4.
Now I'd like to translate the cell along the z-axis (and later also rotate). This can be done easily with TRCL card but may I apply the same transformation to the F4 segmented tally and FMESH4 tally that I set up for the cell at 0,0,0? so that, for instance, I do not need to define planes orthogonal to the z-axis or the mesh at different heights but such that the tallies on the translated cell inherit, somehow, the structure of the original tallies?

The section of the manual about tallies in repeated structure is mainly focused on lattices or elements of the universes and not about segmentation or meshes.

Thanks in advance
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Grelbr42
Engineering news on Phys.org
You don't use the TR card to move the FMESH. You use the origin and axis entries on the FMESH. That let's you specify the origin of the mesh, the x-axis of the mesh, and the orientation of the mesh y-axis relative to the x-axis. If you were doing a cylindrical mesh then you specify the z-axis of the cylinder and the location of the zero of angle around the cylinder.

Note: Read the manual about the bounds of the FMESH very carefully when you are using this feature. Try it out a few times on runs with very small number of particles. The manual is kind of confusing, at least for me, on how the bounds are affected by the origin.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 19matthew89
Grelbr42 said:
You don't use the TR card to move the FMESH. You use the origin and axis entries on the FMESH. That let's you specify the origin of the mesh, the x-axis of the mesh, and the orientation of the mesh y-axis relative to the x-axis. If you were doing a cylindrical mesh then you specify the z-axis of the cylinder and the location of the zero of angle around the cylinder.

Note: Read the manual about the bounds of the FMESH very carefully when you are using this feature. Try it out a few times on runs with very small number of particles. The manual is kind of confusing, at least for me, on how the bounds are affected by the origin.
Yeah! I already got in that kind of situation with the origin so now I know how to deal with that 😅 Indeed for mesh tally I already did and it was fast enough and not a big deal.
It would be more useful in the case of the of F4 tallies. With my current setup everything is anyway pretty easy but, but I'm afraid it might be a bit more bothersome when cells are going to be tilted.
 
Hi 19matthew89,

your post about the "trans" coomand was very interesting for me!
Please, could you suggest a way to combine linear and rotated tallies?

Thank you
Laura
 
lauraB said:
Hi 19matthew89,

your post about the "trans" coomand was very interesting for me!
Please, could you suggest a way to combine linear and rotated tallies?

Thank you
Laura
Hi Laura,
I don't exactly understand what you mean...
Every TR card (which has to follow a TRANS key word) is to be defined with a linear displacement vector:

TRn o1 o2 o3 xx’ yx’ zx’ xy’ yy’ zy’ xz’ yz’ zz’ m

with o1, o2, and o3 displacement vector.

Is this that you mean with "linear and rotated tallies"?

Cheers
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K