rumki8 said:
Now my question is, if its bad to have low blood pressure wouldn’t you think there would be a pill to safely raise it much like those who take BP meds to lower there high pressure.
First, one should not assume there is a pill to cure everything. People expect this, but if we already had a pill for everything, there'd be no ongoing pharmaceutical research; and a pill isn't always needed when anything from lifestyle changes to physical intervention may be more appropriate.
As Jim pointed out, we do not diagnose anyone here, and we do not second-guess your physician; if you are uncomfortable with the amount of information/explanation your physician is providing, seek a second, or even third, opinion from another physician who can do a physical exam and get your complete medical history.
Low blood pressure can occur for many reasons, some pathological, some not. Very fit athletes can have low blood pressure, and this is perfectly normal and healthy for them (there has been some suggestion that the "normal" blood pressure of 120/80 may actually be high for some...I'd have to do some digging for a reference and to check if there is any consensus to that in recent years; I think I only had come across one report suggesting this a few years back). Low blood pressure can also occur due to things like blood loss and dehydration, which is dangerous. In those cases, medications are not the best approach, but replacement of lost fluid volume and patients are treated with IV fluids in a hospital setting. I'm just giving two extreme examples here, one of a normal physiological state, and one of a severely life-threatening, pathophysiological state, both of which include low blood pressure as a "symptom" so you can see why "low" blood pressure is not sufficient for any determination of health or disease, and why you need to address this with a physician who knows the rest of your history and other findings of a physical exam to determine if there is any reason to be concerned by your blood pressure.