Is It true that matter cannot be created or destroyed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PokemonPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principle of conservation of matter, specifically addressing whether matter can be created or destroyed. Participants clarify that while matter can change forms, such as in trees absorbing carbon dioxide and water to grow, it is not created or destroyed in closed systems. However, in nuclear reactions, such as those in particle accelerators and nuclear reactors, matter can be converted to energy, as described by Einstein's equation E=mc². The conversation also touches on the nuances of matter versus mass, particularly in the context of black holes and particle collisions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the law of conservation of mass and energy
  • Familiarity with nuclear reactions and particle physics
  • Knowledge of Einstein's equation E=mc²
  • Basic concepts of chemical bonding and energy release
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of nuclear fission and fusion
  • Explore the implications of the holographic principle in black hole physics
  • Learn about particle creation in high-energy collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
  • Investigate the differences between matter and mass in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of matter and energy, particularly in the context of nuclear physics and cosmology.

  • #31
Dale said:
By “matter” I mean the fermions of the Standard Model and by destroyed I mean that the Feynman diagrams for the interaction has the fermion entering but not leaving.

This is a good precise definition, yes.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
PeterDonis said:
This is a good precise definition, yes.
Thanks! I also recognize that there are other possible definitions
 
  • #33
Dale said:
By “matter” I mean the fermions of the Standard Model and by destroyed I mean that the Feynman diagrams for the interaction has the fermion entering but not leaving.

A fine definition. But note that conservation of angular momentum prevents the sort of processes you are describing.
 
  • #34
Vanadium 50 said:
conservation of angular momentum prevents the sort of processes you are describing.

?? A QED diagram with two entering fermion lines (electron and positron) and two exiting photon lines is perfectly consistent; it just has to have two vertices (at lowest order).
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #35
You're right. I was thinking about something else entirely: N fermions in, N-1 fermions out.
 
  • #36
PeterDonis said:
Whether matter can be destroyed depends on what you mean by "matter" and what you mean by "destroyed".

Agreed. They are almost weasel words when exact context is not nailed down.
 
  • #37
Outhouse said:
They are almost weasel words when exact context is not nailed down

I think "weasel words" is a bit strong; the terms do have well-established meanings. They just don't have unique well-established meanings. But I agree that nailing down exact context is a good thing.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
21K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
575
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
113K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K