Is it worth transferring from UC Davis to UCLA for a career in physics research?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision of transferring from UC Davis to UCLA for a career in physics research. Participants explore the implications of such a transfer on academic and research opportunities, as well as the potential impact on graduate school applications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses enjoyment of their current situation at UC Davis, emphasizing the importance of established relationships and research opportunities in their decision-making process.
  • Another participant suggests that UC Davis is a reputable institution and advises focusing on current studies rather than risking a transfer for uncertain benefits.
  • A different participant questions the motivation for transferring, asking if there are specific courses or research groups at UCLA that are not available at UC Davis, and cautions against sacrificing existing advantages for potential gains.
  • One participant argues that graduate admissions will depend more on performance relative to peers and existing research opportunities rather than the prestige of the institution, suggesting that the current benefits at UC Davis outweigh the unknowns at UCLA.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism about the necessity and potential benefits of transferring to UCLA, highlighting the value of current opportunities at UC Davis. There is no consensus on whether transferring is advisable, as differing views on the importance of institutional prestige versus established relationships and research opportunities are evident.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully explored the specific research opportunities or courses available at UCLA, nor have they detailed the potential challenges of establishing new relationships in a different department.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering transferring between universities for physics research, particularly those weighing the importance of established relationships and research opportunities against institutional prestige.

gregarob
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am hoping that the infinite wisdom of Physics Forums can help me with a bit of an issue I have. Although I really do enjoy UC Davis, I applied for transfer this year and was admitted by UCLA. It is a tough choice for me because I am already well-rooted in the physics department at UCD and really enjoy the college-town atmosphere. On the other hand, I want to make sure that my decision is best for a career in physics research.

One important consideration for me is that I am already doing HEP research with one of my favorite professors, and it may take a while for me to gain the same traction with a different department. Also of concern is whether a year and a half (if that) will be enough time for professors to get to know me well enough to write strong recommendations for graduate admission.

What are your thoughts? Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like you have a great situation at UCD. I wouldn't give up everything you have for the chance of a better opportunity.
Additionally, UCD is certainly not a school that it looks bad to have attended.
I would concentrate on your studies now so that you can choose where you want to go for grad school.
 
I'm not sure that I understand your motivation for transferring. Are there particular courses that you would have access to at UCLA that you would not be able to take where you are currently? Is there a particular research group or club that you have an interest in that isn't where you are now?

If your motivation is only to improve your score on a graduate school application, I would hesitate giving up what you already have (a school/program that you seem to like and a research project with a professor you like), since you may not be able to get those very easily in a new school and they likely will count for much more than a school name and a somewhat arbitrary ranking.
 
Dont do it. For graduate admissions youre going to be judge on how good a physics student you are relative to your graduating class and the PGRE. It sounds like your doing really well relative to your class and this is offering benefits like research opportunities. Why would you trade that for an unknown standing relative to UCLA class and unknown amount of research opportunities
 

Similar threads

Schools Help with shortlisting graduate programs in HEP-PH/TH
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
How to switch from engineering with unknown undergrad name to Physics?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Admissions Should I apply to Physics PhD programs?
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
9K
Programs Transferring to UCLA for Physics: Advice Needed
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Other More formal education later in career
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Admissions PhD Admission: What Do Committees Want from an MS Applicant in Research?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Admissions Do I have a good shot at CalTech/MIT's graduate program for physics?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
Programs Take a 5th year to do more research?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Double majoring in electrical engineering and physics
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Other Looking for advice about my career....
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K