Is Kronecker Delta a Coordinate-Independent Identity Operator?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jdstokes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Delta
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 8K views
jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Can anyone give me a coordinate-independent definition of [itex]\delta^a_b[/itex] on curved manifolds?

Should it be defined as [itex]\delta^a_b = g^{ac}g_{bc}[/itex] where abstract index notation has been used?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could define it that way. Then again, you could take that as the definition for [itex]g^{ab}[/itex] (the inverse metric) :smile:
One problem, is that we are used to thinking of the Kronecker delta as "the thing which is 1 iff the indices are equal, and 0 otherwise" which of course, introduces coordinates right away. I am wondering if "the unit tensor" (e.g. dxd unit matrix) is a coordinate independent statement... :smile:
 
I find that,

[tex]g_b^a = g^{an}g_{nb} = \delta_b^a[/tex]

but I can't prove it.
 
I though that was the definition of the inverse metric. Basically you have written down that
[tex]g^{-1} g = I[/tex]
 
Yep. Going round in cicles. Break the circle at any point and select a definition.

M
 
jdstokes said:
Can anyone give me a coordinate-independent definition of [itex]\delta^a_b[/itex] on curved manifolds?

Should it be defined as [itex]\delta^a_b = g^{ac}g_{bc}[/itex] where abstract index notation has been used?

If your manifold has a metric, you can give a perfectly good coordinate-independent definition of the Kronecker tensor (and, indeed, its generalizations) in terms of the so-called "musical isomorphism" between the tangent space and cotangent space.

This is pretty basic stuff, but beyond a yearning for strict coordinate-independence, I can't see any actual advantage in using such a definition.
 
CompuChip said:
I am wondering if "the unit tensor" (e.g. dxd unit matrix) is a coordinate independent statement... :smile:
You are nearly there. The coordinate-free version of a matrix is a linear operator, a function that maps vectors to vectors (or covectors to covectors).

So the Kronecker delta is just the identity operator [itex]\delta (\textbf{X}) = \textbf{X}[/itex] acting on any tangent space (or cotangent space).

This follows from the coordinate expression [itex]\delta^a_b X^b = X^a[/itex] which is true in every coordinate system.