Is Language Barrier a Reason for Our Limited Understanding of Black Holes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter A. Neumaier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the limited understanding of black holes and the potential impact of language barriers on scientific communication. Participants humorously note that new insights into black holes often seem to vanish, likening it to being "spaghettified." There are references to the term "black hole" being considered undignified by some French-speaking scientists, sparking jokes and light-hearted banter. The conversation touches on the challenges of translating scientific concepts across languages, which can lead to misunderstandings. Overall, the thread blends serious inquiry with humor while exploring the complexities of discussing black holes.
A. Neumaier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
8,699
Reaction score
4,771
Summary:: The most basic issue queried

Why do we know so little about black holes?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Because whenever new light is shed on them, it immediately disappears behind the horizon!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes DennisN, Wrichik Basu, dextercioby and 10 others
Many physicists are satisfied with a Kerrsory understanding.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, martinbn, DaveC426913 and 3 others
I've fixed the thread level prefix
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Frabjous
Doesn't this belong in the "lame jokes" thread?
 
PeroK said:
Doesn't this belong in the "lame jokes" thread?
It actually started off as a serious question by @DaveC426913 but his post #1 somehow disappeared
 
  • Skeptical
Likes DaveC426913
phinds said:
It actually started off as a serious question by @DaveC426913 but his post #1 somehow disappeared
So Dave is, is, spaghettified now? :oops:
 
  • Haha
Likes Wrichik Basu, Klystron, vanhees71 and 2 others
berkeman said:
So Dave is, is, spaghettified now? :oops:
Or maybe firewalled...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71 and berkeman
phinds said:
It actually started off as a serious question by @DaveC426913 but his post #1 somehow disappeared
I do not recall this. Are you suggesting I started this thread? No. I would have been more descriptive with my subject line.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #10
DaveC426913 said:
I do not recall this. Are you suggesting I started this thread? No. I would have been more descriptive with my subject line.
Unless there was information loss.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, Klystron, ergospherical and 3 others
  • #11
DaveC426913 said:
I do not recall this. Are you suggesting I started this thread? No. I would have been more descriptive with my subject line.
Huh. Maybe I'm having a senior moment but I could have sworn the original post was yours. Guess my memory isn't what it used to be *

* to be fair, my memory never was what it used to be
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71 and DaveC426913
  • #12
DaveC426913 said:
I would have been more descriptive with my subject line.
Whereas this subject line has no hair. :-p
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Hamiltonian, ergospherical, martinbn and 1 other person
  • #13
...but quantum hair!
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian, ergospherical and DaveC426913
  • #14
jedi: That would be entangled quantum hair.

dark jedi: A frayed knot.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #15
Glaswegian joke:

Is that a black hole or a meringue?

You're right enough, it's a black hole!
 
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71 and Ibix
  • #16
PeroK said:
Doesn't this belong in the "lame jokes" thread?
No. It belongs in the "April 1 jokes" thread - wherever that thread is...
 
  • #17
Rumor has it French speaking scientists objected to the term as undignified.
 
  • #18
A. Neumaier said:
No. It belongs in the "April 1 jokes" thread - wherever that thread is...
Heh, heh, I started one several years ago, here.

But the joke character would be lost if they were all put in an obviously-Apr1 thread.
 
  • #19
Klystron said:
Rumor has it French speaking scientists objected to the term as undignified.
Huh? Is that because they have a stronger cultural emphasis on bleaching?
 
  • #21
ergospherical said:
Many physicists are satisfied with a Kerrsory understanding.
Sadly, most physicists don’t Kerr.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes ergospherical, jedishrfu and berkeman
  • #22
strangerep said:
Huh? Is that because they have a stronger cultural emphasis on bleaching?
My knowledge of French colloquialism being non-existent, the translation evoked a different body part.
 
  • #23
Klystron said:
My knowledge of French colloquialism being non-existent, the translation evoked a different body part.
Even rereading the thread several times, I still don't know what term exactly it is the French find undignified... Unless it's 'black hole'.
 
  • #24
DaveC426913 said:
Even rereading the thread several times, I still don't know what term exactly it is the French find undignified... Unless it's 'black hole'.
When I was a child, I was taught by engineers and scientists who had read physics papers in German and certain math and electronics papers in French. English translations for Americans contained many assumptions, misunderstandings and errors. My dad's old science textbooks written in English often contained untranslated sections in European languages that the student was assumed to understand. To this day I am still learning what some old textbooks actually meant.

In this context many jokes arose due to colloquial expressions. For instance, I think a lot of nonsense surrounding Albert Einstein 'quotations' arose from poor translations and outright jokes from colleagues. The OP retains a certain dignified Old World style in his textbooks IMO that I enjoy reading.

Hence, my use of the term 'undignified' when alluding to the 'black hole' naming kerfuffle. All in fun.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
Back
Top