Is Limiting Medical Care to 1960s Standards a Viable Cost-Cutting Strategy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter edpell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cut Medical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Limiting medical care to standards from the 1960s is not a viable cost-cutting strategy. The discussion highlights that while life in 1960 was acceptable, it does not reflect the advancements in healthcare that have occurred since then. The proposal to restrict funding for modern drugs, surgeries, and procedures is deemed unrealistic and impractical. Overall, the consensus is that reverting to outdated medical practices would not effectively address current healthcare costs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of historical healthcare practices and standards
  • Knowledge of modern medical advancements and technologies
  • Familiarity with healthcare economics and cost management
  • Awareness of public health outcomes from different eras
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of healthcare advancements since the 1960s
  • Explore modern healthcare cost management strategies
  • Investigate public health outcomes in the 1960s versus today
  • Analyze case studies on healthcare funding and policy changes
USEFUL FOR

Healthcare policymakers, medical professionals, economists, and anyone interested in the evolution of medical care and its financial implications.

edpell
Messages
282
Reaction score
4
A simple way to cut medical cost would be to limit medical care to only items that were widely available in 1960. Do not fund any drug, surgery, procedure, etc.

Life in 1960 was OK. People did not die in the streets. Unless we are saying people are less healthy today than 1960 this should drive medical costs back to there 1960 level.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Sorry, but this isn't a realistic enough option for discussion. Locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K