Is Linear Algebra More Important Than Calculus in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Winzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion, participants assert that both linear algebra and calculus are essential in physics, with neither being more important than the other. While some argue that linear algebra feels more relevant to quantum mechanics, the consensus is that calculus is indispensable for first-year physics courses. The interplay between linear algebra and calculus is highlighted, emphasizing that both are foundational for understanding complex concepts in physics, including quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with linear algebra fundamentals
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics principles
  • Ability to apply mathematical concepts to physical theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of linear algebra in quantum mechanics
  • Explore advanced calculus applications in physics
  • Investigate the relationship between algebra, trigonometry, and calculus
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of physical theories
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of physical theories, particularly those studying quantum mechanics and the interplay between linear algebra and calculus.

Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0
Some physics major told me:
"Linear Algebra is much more important then calculus"
Can anyone give weight to these words?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmm. That sounds a bit like saying, "I'm already comfortable with calculus, and linear algebra is novel and interesting to me, so it must be more important."

Or perhaps, "Linear algebra feels more relevant to quantum mechanics, and since that's the course I'm taking right now, it must be more important than calculus."
 
It's simply not true.

In physics, linear algebra and calculus work together quite often to create some rather powerful results. They're both extremely important and without either of them, you could do very little. If one wanted to be particular, though, you can get through first year physics without touching linear algebra, but try getting through any first year physics course without calculus.

Even in quantum mechanics, linear algebra and calculus play equally important roles. (Heck, you can't even comprehend L^2 without linear algebra or calculus, and that's where everything in QM is derived from.)
 
... yes, just like physics majors think physics is much more important than math (ask them).
 
The logical mind knows that Algebra forms the "primary" base of both Trig and Calculus; therefore - an UNBREAKABLE permanent relationship is always present in ALL SCIENCES.

Now, the wise mind knows that because Algebra is ALWAYS in there, it can be "ignored" for a "while".

Now, the ordered mind reminds itself that specific "Algebra only" calculations, must be "performed" as "final proof", of any proposed theory.

The practical mind knows most "hold ups" in prooving "theories" is structure; so "Algebra" is on the back bunner for a while.

The experimental mind gradually matures to an assumption, that because every possible "math" issue that "appears" to be in the Calculus always gets "solved" independantly: it has to be somewhere else.

The precise mind finds the "problem" to have been in the Algebra all along; causing "errors" in the Trig and Calculus when their base "rules" were set up in the first place; and "finds" a SINGLE assuption that "caused" the mess.

The patient mind is one with the cosmos; therefore, evolves into a "pure black" mental state, which is the foundation of the open mind.
 
AUMathTutor said:
... yes, just like physics majors think physics is much more important than math (ask them).
How silly of them!
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K