Is Low Bone Density Putting You at Risk for Disability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of low bone density for a relative's potential qualification for Social Security disability benefits. Participants explore the relationship between bone density, risk of fractures, and the challenges faced in securing disability claims, particularly in the context of a history of cerebral palsy and manual labor limitations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that low bone density increases the risk of fractures, but question whether this alone is sufficient for a disability claim.
  • Others suggest that recent advancements in medication for bone density should be discussed with a physician.
  • There is concern that Social Security disability claims often require evidence of an actual injury rather than a risk of injury.
  • One participant expresses frustration over the relative's inability to secure stable employment despite efforts to find work in manual labor roles.
  • Another participant raises the need for a current medical evaluation to determine the underlying cause of the low bone density and to confirm any past diagnoses.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of cerebral palsy and whether it could be linked to current disabilities, with some participants suggesting that a neurologist could provide clarity.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the history behind the initial bone density test and any related medical conditions that may affect the relative's case.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the relationship between low bone density and disability claims, with no consensus on whether the bone density issue alone is sufficient for a claim. There is also disagreement on the interpretation of cerebral palsy and its implications for the relative's current condition.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations such as the loss of medical records, the need for updated evaluations, and the complexities of navigating the disability claims process. There is uncertainty regarding the specific diagnosis and its implications for both bone density and neurological function.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals dealing with similar issues related to bone density, disability claims, or the effects of cerebral palsy may find this discussion relevant.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
At least ten years ago, at about age forty-seven, a relative was told that a bone density test indicated that he had the bones of an eighty year old. For a number of reasons we are hoping that he might now qualify for SS disability benefits, and we were thinking that this bone density issue might do it.

Assuming that the degradation is now ten years further along, and since he mainly does manual labor when he can get work, does anyone know if a physician would say that he at serious risk for fractures, and that this justifies a disability claim? Of course this assumes that a new test would confirm the previous results.
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
First, on the bone density issue, it does put one at higher risk for fractures. But, compared with 10 years ago, there are also some drugs now on the market that are intended to help either retain or improve bone density. So, if this hasn't been brought up with his physician recently, he should look into it.

On the side of disability claims, knowing the hassles others have gone through when they were already injured and had sufficient pain to prevent them from working, I don't think SS is going to let him base a disability claim on risk of fractures. Unfortunately, that system seems to be set up that you have to actually injure yourself to the point where you can't work first (and even then they give you a ton of hassles).
 
Crud, you're probably right.

This is so frustrating. He had CP but all of the medical records were lost. He is really not up to doing manual labor any longer, and mentally, for example, he is not up to something as challenging as running a cash register, but on both counts he doesn't quite qualify for benefits. His unemployment has run out and he can't get a job.
 
Even if he's not up to running a cash register, maybe he could find work in a hardware store or Home Depot type place, based on his manual labor background? What kinds of manual labor did he generally do? If it was sheetrock or bricks or some other construction-related work, they might like having him in the aisles doing light stocking duties and consulting with customers.
 
We have pretty much exhausted those options. He has done the worst jobs, such as picking rocks out of dirt in 110 degree heat. He has managed to get a bit of seasonal work with the local fruit packers, he worked as a security guard and doing housecleaning tasks for offices, but he can't seem to keep a job for long. We put together the best resume possible and submitted to the two Wal Marts and two Home Depots within driving distance, but not a bite after two years. He goes to the employment office every day, but he only manages to land temp jobs like those mentioned above, for a week here and there, every once in awhile.

As nearly as I can tell, unless the job is pure manual labor, eventually he screws up and gets canned. And now he's old enough and looking frail enough that he's not getting the manual jobs. His IQ was one point above or below the limit [we don't know for sure, but we are talking about an IQ of sixty here] to qualify for assistance, so the state denied the original claim and the appeal, and require further evaluation, which will probably take another year to work through before we can even apply again.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
At least ten years ago, at about age forty-seven, a relative was told that a bone density test indicated that he had the bones of an eighty year old. For a number of reasons we are hoping that he might now qualify for SS disability benefits, and we were thinking that this bone density issue might do it.

What was the diagnosis... I have never heard of a 47 year old man having osteoporosis but i don't know what else it would be...

You can't claim disability without a medically diagnosed disability... and having a lose bone density would be a symptom and not a cause...
 
Revenged said:
What was the diagnosis...

I don't know. I only heard about it a week or two ago, but the test was done over ten years ago. The doctor who did the tests is dead and his office is gone.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
I don't know. I only heard about it a week or two ago, but the test was done over ten years ago. The doctor who did the tests is dead and his office is gone.

ok... get him to see the doctor again then... if i was told by a doctor that i had the bones of an 80 year old - then i wouldn't rest until i knew the underlying cause!... there's probably loads of things it could be...
 
Yes, we are planning that he be fully evaluated.

Does anyone know if it can be shown now that he suffered brain damage due to CP, as a baby?
 
  • #10
Ivan Seeking said:
Does anyone know if it can be shown now that he suffered brain damage due to CP, as a baby?

What are you using the abbreviation "CP" to mean? I usually think cerebral palsy when someone says "CP," but that's not something you have as a child and then goes away. It's a lifelong disorder that is the result of a neurological problem, not the cause of it. So, I'm wondering if you're using the abbreviation to mean something else? If he has CP, he may have learned to compensate, but the neurological deficit would still be present. A neurologist could help make a definitive diagnosis. From what you've been describing, this sounds like someone with a neurological disability that is also affecting his physical abilities, so if the old medical records are lost, it sounds like you need to see a neurologist to re-diagnose him (or verify if CP was even the right diagnosis). The same for the bone scan. That's something that certainly should be confirmed. If you can find out information from his family about why the initial scan was performed, that might help provide a new doctor with a better history. Afterall, you don't usually do a bone scan on someone that young unless you have a reason to suspect a problem...either a history of fractures under unusual circumstances (if a pattern of an unusually large number of old, healed fractures, or fractures in uncommon places, can be seen on x-rays, that might make a more convincing case), or something known about either the disease he has or medications he's been taking that would deplete bone density.
 
  • #11
I do mean cerebral palsy. The irony is that when born, the doctors believed that he would have to be institutionalized for his entire life. Due to the heroic efforts of his parents, he made amazing progress while growing up, but he clearly is not fully functional. I suspect that he has always compensated by working very hard at fairly simple, manual labor tasks.

Okay, so it sounds like we need to plan time with the doctors. Also, I believe that a couple of knee surgeries may have motivated the bone density test, but that's about all that I know.

Thanks for the help. This is all a bit much to sort out.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K