Is mathematics invented or discovered?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Meden Agan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The debate on whether mathematics is invented or discovered centers around two perspectives: the subjective construction of mathematical symbols and axioms versus the objective truths that emerge from established frameworks. Key distinctions are made between syntax, semantics, and application, highlighting that while foundational choices (like those in non-Euclidean geometry) represent invention, the truths derived from these frameworks (such as Pythagoras' theorem) are discoveries. The interplay between invention and discovery is further illustrated through examples like computability and the Peano axioms, emphasizing that mathematical creativity lies in the formulation of concepts while rigor is applied in proving them. Ultimately, the discussion suggests a nuanced view where mathematics may exist in a category of its own, potentially termed as "incovered" or "disvented."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical philosophy and its historical context
  • Familiarity with foundational concepts in geometry, such as Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometries
  • Knowledge of formal logic, particularly first-order logic and completeness theorems
  • Basic grasp of computability theory, including Turing machines and recursive functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the first-order completeness theorem in mathematical logic
  • Investigate the principles of non-Euclidean geometry and its applications
  • Study the foundations of computability theory and its various definitions
  • Examine the philosophical implications of mathematical Platonism and its critiques
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers of mathematics, mathematicians, educators, and anyone interested in the foundational questions surrounding the nature of mathematical truth and creativity.

  • #61
phyzguy said:
So from that standpoint, when did this invention of the human mind come into existence?
(1) When Galois first wrote about group theory?
(2) When people started studying simple groups?
(3) When someone first realized that this huge group existed?
(4) Since obviously nobody has conceptualized the monster group as a whole, does it exist even now?
Does it have to be exact moment?

Most inventions go through refinement over time. Is one point more valid than all the others? Or more of a Theseus's Ship writ temporal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
DaveC426913 said:
The group - "the primes" - was invented.
In the sense that humans formed the concept and explicitly recognized its properties, sure.

But at least one of those properties--the fact that a prime number has no other factors besides itself and ##1##--is the reason why evolution produced the time periods for cicadas that it did. That reason exists independently of humans and does not require humans to conceptualize it in order to drive an evolutionary process.

So while one could say we humans invented the part that we explicitly formulated, I don't think you can say humans invented the properties that drove evolutionary processes that happened independently of humans and without even requiring humans to exist. Those things, we discovered.
 
  • #63
phyzguy said:
when did this invention of the human mind come into existence?
Invention is a process, not an event. There is no instant of time when an invention "comes into existence". You are trying to draw sharp boundaries in a domain where they simply don't work.
 
  • #64
PeterDonis said:
In the sense that humans formed the concept and explicitly recognized its properties, sure.

But at least one of those properties--the fact that a prime number has no other factors besides itself and ##1##--is the reason why evolution produced the time periods for cicadas that it did. That reason exists independently of humans and does not require humans to conceptualize it in order to drive an evolutionary process.

So while one could say we humans invented the part that we explicitly formulated, I don't think you can say humans invented the properties that drove evolutionary processes that happened independently of humans and without even requiring humans to exist. Those things, we discovered.
Exactly correct. My point was that virtually any kind of grouping (though not all) is abstract and created by humans.

Like the monster group and Galois' theorems, where this started (for me) around post 33.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
8K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
25K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
28K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K