Is More Work Done By Lifting an Object Diagonally or Straight Up?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of work done when lifting a mass, specifically comparing the work required to lift an object diagonally versus straight up. The subject area includes physics principles related to work, energy, and forces in a gravitational field.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the path taken to lift an object and the work done, questioning whether lifting diagonally requires more work than lifting straight up. Some argue that additional horizontal force contributes to the overall work, while others emphasize that gravitational potential energy is independent of the path taken.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored regarding the nature of work done in different lifting scenarios. Some participants provide insights about the effects of horizontal movement and the implications of a conservative field, while others express confusion about the relevance of horizontal forces in the context of gravitational potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific conditions such as friction or air resistance, which could affect the work done in real-world scenarios. There is also mention of the assumption that the system is frictionless, leading to further exploration of the implications of this assumption on the work-energy relationship.

Morhas
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



True or False: To raise a 2.3kg mass from its resting place on a table, more work is done by lifting it diagonally than lifting it straight up.

Homework Equations



w=fd


The Attempt at a Solution



True: I argued that although the same amount of force is being applied vertically, some force needs to initially be applied in the horizontal component, thus making the overall work greater.

Correct answer is false
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravity is a conservative field.

Work goes to potential energy which is given merely by the m*g*Δh without regard to the path it took to get there.
 
Your argument is actually a pretty good one. Some work is indeed done by the force applied initially. But that is not the entire story - what happens after you lift the mass?
 
The question didn't even specify it was a frictionless system, so there would be air resistance as well.

@Lowly Pion: I'm not sure I understand. Although work is still being done and converted to gravitational potential energy, wouldn't an additional force have to be applied to start horizontal translation. I guess you could say that it would be an infinitely small force over an infinitely small interval of time, but it is still a force nevertheless.

@Naresh: What does happen after you lift the mass? In both cases they would have the same gravitational potential energy, just in one case slightly more work was done to achieve it.
 
If there is air resistance, you obviously do some additional work since the field is not conservative - but let us ignore friction for now.

So you did some additional work and gave the object some horizontal velocity. What happens to that horizontal velocity? The additional work you did was not to achieve the change in gravitational potential energy..
 
I agree.

Since the force vector is always pointing donwards, due to acceleration produced by gravity, then the work that is being done in both cases is the same.
 
Last edited:
I'm afraid I don't understand that argument.The horizontal velocity will remain constant, but I don't see that being relevant since a force was still required to start it. While the additional work done didn't achieve any gravitational potential energy, additional work was done.
 
It doesn't matter. Look at the equation:

W=F*d
If you lift it a certain distance straight up, the force required will be greater than if you had to lift it diagnally. However, if you lift it diagnally, less force is required, HOWEVER, you cover a greater distance, which compensates for the smaller force.
 
So if I lift a brick a foot off the ground diagonally over a 1000m distance, it would take the same amount of work to lift it straight up?

I have done the same work vertically, but I have also done fd horizontally. (Sorry that was poorly worded)
 
  • #10
Just looking at the horizontal component of the displacement, force, velocity etc.:

Initially you apply a small force to get the object moving in the horizontal direction. This does work, and in the absence of friction, imparts some velocity to the object. The work, therefore, has gone into increasing the kinetic energy of the object.

When the object eventually comes to a rest, it has no horizontal velocity. Its kinetic energy has been removed, therefore some negative work has been done on it. This means you applied a force in the reverse direction. Again, in the absence of friction, the negative work done to stop the object is equal in magnitude to the work done to get the object moving horizontally. Therefore, if you move a brick a km horizontally, you don't do any net work. (In your equation W = F.d, F is not constant, it changes sign). The only work done goes towards increasing the potential energy of the object.

This may be hard to imagine because there is always friction in the real world, so one is always doing some work to overcome energy dissipation. But in an "ideal" world, there is no work done when something is moved horizontally.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
18K