Calculating Work in Lifting a Bucket

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the work done by a worker lifting a 20.0-kg bucket of concrete to the top of a 20.0-m tall building, with the bucket reaching a final velocity of 4.0 m/s. The context is rooted in mechanics, specifically focusing on work, force, and energy concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between work, force, and distance, while also considering the impact of the bucket's final velocity on the work calculation. Some express confusion about how to incorporate kinetic energy into their calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to solve the problem, with some participants offering different methods and questioning the validity of assumptions made in those methods. There is a recognition of differing approaches, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the force may not be constant during the lift, and there is a mention of the need to consider both potential and kinetic energy in the calculations. The original poster has not returned to the thread for further clarification or follow-up.

Brian McKalip
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A worker lifts a 20.0-kg bucket of concrete from the ground up to the top of a 20.0-m tall
building. The bucket is initially at rest, but is traveling at 4.0 m/s when it reaches the top of the
building. What is the minimum amount of work that the worker did in lifting the bucket?

A) 160 J B) 3.92 kJ C) 400 J D) 560 J E) 4.08 kJ

Homework Equations


F= ma
W= Fd

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is given to me, it is e, 4.08kJ However I am unable to get that answer,. I know that I have to solve W = Fd, and that d = distance traveled = 20m, however I'm confused by the given final velocity of 4.0m/s I don't know how to incorporate this into my process. When I solve for Force, I do F = (20kg)(-9.8m/s^2) however have a feeling, I need to determine a new acceleration from the 4.0m/s velocity given, but I don't know how to do that.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the bucket gets to the top it has kinetic energy.
 
Did you ever figure out how to do thins problem?
 
Timmy1221 said:
Did you ever figure out how to do thins problem?
Asking whom?
 
F= m.a
W= F.d
use thıs two fırst to get the value
K=1/2 M v^2
and add thıs one
f=20x(9,8)=196N
w=196.20=3920N
k=1/2.20.(4^2)=160N
we should add thıs two value because final velocity of the partıcle is 4 m/s.
answer=160+3920N=4080N
solving by
FUAT MERT AĞARLI
 
wwmertww said:
F= m.a
W= F.d
use thıs two fırst to get the value
K=1/2 M v^2
and add thıs one
f=20x(9,8)=196N
That is not really valid since we are not told that the force is constant.
Just use net change in PE + KE.
 
A man lifts a 20-kg box from the ground up to the top of a 30-m high building. The box is initially at rest, but it
travels at 4 m/s when it reaches the top of the building. How much work is done by the man in lifting the box?
A. 5840 J
B. 160 J
C. 2400 J
D. 6000 J
E. 6160 J

answer is still same, ıt is still working if you solve it my way
 
wwmertww said:
A man lifts a 20-kg box from the ground up to the top of a 30-m high building. The box is initially at rest, but it
travels at 4 m/s when it reaches the top of the building. How much work is done by the man in lifting the box?
A. 5840 J
B. 160 J
C. 2400 J
D. 6000 J
E. 6160 J

answer is still same, ıt is still working if you solve it my way
Yes, of course it gives the same answer, but if your method makes unwarranted assumptions then it is not a proof.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, of course it gives the same answer, but if your method makes unwarranted assumptions then it is not a proof.

wwmertww isn't the OP. He shouldn't be posting solutions by any method!
 
  • #10
Cutter Ketch said:
wwmertww isn't the OP. He shouldn't be posting solutions by any method!
The original post is several years old and the only post the OP ever made; he never returned to follow up with the thread. The mentors that have looked at the issue of the complete solution attempt offered up by @wwmertww feel that it won't benefit the OP at this late date, and that the ensuing discussion of the solution offering is probably more valuable in terms of insightful information than the original question :smile: So we've decided to let the post and the followup discussion stand.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
992
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K