Is My Application of the Neyman-Pearson Lemma Correct?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathjam0990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apply
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the Neyman-Pearson Lemma in hypothesis testing, specifically for a single observation modeled by a geometric distribution. The critical region is defined by the likelihood ratio test, expressed as $$\frac{L(\theta_0 \ | \ x)}{L(\theta_1 \ | \ x)} \geq k$$. The calculation leads to the threshold $$k^{*} = 1 + \frac{\ln\left(\frac{k \theta_1}{\theta_0}\right)}{\ln\left(\frac{1-\theta_0}{1-\theta_1}\right)}$$, which determines the rejection region for the null hypothesis $H_0: \theta = \theta_0$. The type I error is also analyzed, confirming that the probability of incorrectly rejecting $H_0$ can be expressed as $$\mathbb{P}(X \geq k^{*} \ | \theta = \theta_0) = \alpha$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Neyman-Pearson Lemma
  • Familiarity with likelihood ratio tests
  • Knowledge of geometric distribution properties
  • Basic concepts of hypothesis testing and type I error
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of likelihood ratios in hypothesis testing
  • Learn about type I and type II errors in statistical tests
  • Explore generalizations of the Neyman-Pearson Lemma for multiple observations
  • Investigate the implications of geometric distributions in real-world applications
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, and researchers involved in hypothesis testing and statistical inference, particularly those working with geometric distributions and likelihood ratio tests.

mathjam0990
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
View attachment 5426What I have done so far...

View attachment 5427

Is this correct so far? If not, would someone be able to provide an explanation as to how to solve this? I am not sure if I am going in the right direction. Thank you
 

Attachments

  • (4).jpg
    (4).jpg
    34.6 KB · Views: 147
  • (5).jpg
    (5).jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 118
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work is fine so far! However, the question states that we only consider a single observation. Therefore, you just have to consider the quotient of the likelihoods for one observation $x$: The critical region $C$ is given by
$$\frac{L(\theta_0 \ | \ x)}{L(\theta_1 \ | \ x)} \geq k.$$
An easy calculation gives
$$\frac{L(\theta_0 \ | \ x)}{L(\theta_1 \ | \ x)} = \frac{\theta_0 (1-\theta_0)^{x-1}}{\theta_1 (1-\theta_1)^{x-1}} = \left(\frac{\theta_0}{\theta_1}\right)\left(\frac{1-\theta_0}{1-\theta_1}\right)^{x-1} \geq k,$$
which implies that (please recheck this)
$$x \geq 1 + \frac{\ln\left(\frac{k \theta_1}{\theta_0}\right)}{\ln\left(\frac{1-\theta_0}{1-\theta_1}\right)} := k^{*}.$$
Hence, by the Neyman-Pearson lemma, the rejection region for the most powerful hypothesis test $H_0: \theta = \theta_0$ and $H_A: \theta =\theta_1$ where $\theta_1>\theta_0$ is given by $x \geq k^{*}$. Note that since the geometric distribution is discrete, this critical region $C = \{k^{*},k^{*}+1,\ldots,\}$. We still need to compute $k^{*}$. This can be done by looking at the type $I$-error, since $\mathbb{P}(H_0 \ \mbox{is false} \ | \ H_0) = \alpha$. Now $H_0$ is false if $x \geq k^{*}$ and hence the type $I$-error satisfies
\begin{align}
\mathbb{P}(X \geq k^{*} \ | \theta = \theta_0) = \sum_{k = k^{*}}^{\infty} (1-\theta_0)^{k-1} \theta_0 = \alpha,
\end{align}
from which you can extract $k^{*}$. I think you can also generalize this to multiple observations $x_1,\ldots,x_n$. In that case you will have to determine the distribution of $\overline{x}$ which can be a little bit more messy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K