Is My Solution for the Speed of a Decaying Particle Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lriuui0x0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle Speed
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on verifying a solution for calculating the speed of a decaying particle using conservation of momentum. The user presents a series of equations involving mass (M), momentum (p), and energy (E) to derive the speed of particle R in the rest frame of particle P. The final derived formula for speed is confirmed as v = \frac{M^2 - m^2}{M^2 + m^2}c, which aligns with the expected results from energy-momentum conservation principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum in particle physics
  • Familiarity with relativistic energy-momentum equations
  • Knowledge of mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of relativistic momentum and energy equations
  • Learn about the implications of conservation laws in particle decay processes
  • Explore the Doppler effect in the context of energy-momentum diagrams
  • Investigate the relationship between mass ratios and velocity in relativistic physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, particle physicists, and anyone interested in understanding particle decay dynamics and relativistic effects in momentum and energy calculations.

lriuui0x0
Messages
101
Reaction score
25
Homework Statement
A particle ##P## of mass ##M## decays into a particle ##R## with mass ##0 < m < M## and a massless particle. Calculate the speed of ##R## in ##P##'s rest frame
Relevant Equations
##m^2c^2 = E^2/c^2 - \mathbf{p}^2##
I have attempted a solution using conservation of momentum. Could people help check if this solution is correct (the result looks weird), as the problem doesn't have solution with it.

$$
\begin{aligned}
\begin{pmatrix}Mc \\ 0\end{pmatrix} &= \begin{pmatrix}E_R/c \\ \mathbf{p}_R\end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix}E_\gamma/c \\ \mathbf{p}_\gamma \end{pmatrix} \\
\begin{pmatrix}Mc \\ 0\end{pmatrix} &= \begin{pmatrix}\sqrt{m^2c^2 + \mathbf{p}_R^2} \\ \mathbf{p}_R\end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix}|\mathbf{p}_R| \\ -\mathbf{p}_R \end{pmatrix} \\
M^2c^2 &= m^2c^2 + 2(\sqrt{m^2c^2 + \mathbf{p}_R^2}|\mathbf{p}_R| + \mathbf{p}_R^2) \\
M^2c^2 &= m^2c^2 + 2(m\gamma v\sqrt{m^2c^2 + m^2\gamma^2v^2} + m^2\gamma^2v^2) \\
M^2c^2 &= m^2c^2 + 2(m^2\gamma cv\sqrt{1 + \gamma^2(1-\gamma^{-2})} + m^2\gamma^2v^2) \\
M^2c^2 &= m^2c^2 + 2(m^2\gamma^2cv + m^2\gamma^2v^2) \\
M^2c^2 &= m^2(c^2 + 2\gamma^2cv + \gamma^2v^2) \\
M^2c^2 &= m^2(c^2 + \frac{2cv}{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}} + \frac{v^2}{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}) \\
M^2c^2 &= m^2\frac{c^4 - c^2v^2 + 2c^3v + c^2v^2}{c^2 - v^2} \\
M^2 &= m^2\frac{c^2 + 2cv}{c^2 - v^2} \\
M^2c^2 - M^2v^2 &= m^2c^2 + 2m^2cv \\
M^2v^2 + 2m^2cv + (m^2-M^2)c^2 &= 0 \\
v^2 + 2r^2cv +(r^2-1)c^2 &= 0 \\
v &= (\sqrt{r^4-r^2+1} - r^2)c \\
\end{aligned}
$$

where we have replaced ##r = \frac{m}{M}##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think that's right. I get quite a neat answer.

I would calculate the momentum and then get ##v## from that.
 
PeroK said:
I don't think that's right. I get quite a neat answer.

I would calculate the momentum and then get ##v## from that.
Are you suggesting calculate the ##|\mathbf{p}_R|##? May I ask what's the value of ##v## you got? Are you using the same process that I used?
 
lriuui0x0 said:
Homework Statement:: A particle ##P## of mass ##M## decays into a particle ##R## with mass ##0 < m < M## and a massless particle. Calculate the speed of ##R## in ##P##'s rest frame
Relevant Equations:: ##m^2c^2 = E^2/c^2 - \mathbf{p}^2##

I have attempted a solution using conservation of momentum. Could people help check if this solution is correct (the result looks weird), as the problem doesn't have solution with it.

$$
\begin{pmatrix}Mc \\ 0\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}E_R/c \\ \mathbf{p}_R\end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix}E_\gamma/c \\ \mathbf{p}_\gamma \end{pmatrix} \\
$$
I'd solve the problem in terms of ##E_R## and ##p_R##. Don't express ##E_R## in terms of ##m## and ##p_R## yet. The algebra will be less messy that way.

Also, rewrite your equation slightly before squaring. Take advantage of the zero momentum on the lefthand side.
$$
\begin{pmatrix}Mc \\ 0\end{pmatrix} - \begin{pmatrix}E_R/c \\ \mathbf{p}_R\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}E_\gamma/c \\ \mathbf{p}_\gamma \end{pmatrix} \\
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
lriuui0x0 said:
Are you suggesting calculate the ##|\mathbf{p}_R|##? May I ask what's the value of ##v## you got? Are you using the same process that I used?
Like @vela suggests.
 
Following the suggestion I got:$$
\begin{aligned}
\begin{pmatrix}Mc \\ 0\end{pmatrix} - \begin{pmatrix}E_R/c \\ \mathbf{p}_R\end{pmatrix} &= \begin{pmatrix}E_\gamma/c \\ \mathbf{p}_\gamma \end{pmatrix} \\

M^2c^2 + m^2c^2 - 2Mc\frac{E}{c} &= 0 \\
E &= \frac{(M^2+m^2)c^2}{2M} \\
\end{aligned}
$$

Then solve for ##p^2## we get:

$$
p^2 = \frac{(M^2+m^2)^2 c^2}{4M^2} - m^2c^2
$$

Is the above correct? Continuing on that I plan to solve:

$$
\frac{(M^2+m^2)^2 c^2}{4M^2} - m^2c^2 = m^2v^2\frac{1}{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}
$$

Then solve for ##v##. The result doesn't look neat either, I got something like:

$$
v^2 = (1-\frac{4m^4}{M^4+2M^2m^2+m^4})c^2
$$

Is that the same as what you got?
 
lriuui0x0 said:
Following the suggestion I got:$$
\begin{aligned}
\begin{pmatrix}Mc \\ 0\end{pmatrix} - \begin{pmatrix}E_R/c \\ \mathbf{p}_R\end{pmatrix} &= \begin{pmatrix}E_\gamma/c \\ \mathbf{p}_\gamma \end{pmatrix} \\

M^2c^2 + m^2c^2 - 2Mc\frac{E}{c} &= 0 \\
E &= \frac{(M^2+m^2)c^2}{2M} \\
\end{aligned}
$$

Then solve for ##p^2## we get:

$$
p^2 = \frac{(M^2+m^2)^2 c^2}{4M^2} - m^2c^2
$$
Those are corrrect, but ##p## can be simplified. Also, note that ##\frac v {c^2} = \frac p E##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela
lriuui0x0 said:
Then solve for ##v##. The result doesn't look neat either, I got something like:

$$
v^2 = (1-\frac{4m^4}{M^4+2M^2m^2+m^4})c^2
$$

Is that the same as what you got?
I think it's okay. Note that if you let ##m=M##, you get ##v=0## as you should expect.

Note that the denominator is a perfect square. If it simplifies the way I think it should (I didn't bother working it out from your result), you should get a nice neat answer.

The way @PeroK suggested is the way I solved it. It should get you to the same answer with less algebra.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: docnet
lriuui0x0 said:
$$
v^2 = (1-\frac{4m^4}{M^4+2M^2m^2+m^4})c^2
$$

Is that the same as what you got?
I don't think that's quite right. The ##4m^4## term in the numerator is the problem.
 
  • #10
Oh yeah, it should have been something like ##4m^2M^2##.
 
  • #11
Alright, I think I solved it. We can simplify ##\mathbf{p}^2 = \frac{(M^2-m^2)^2c^2}{4M^2}##. Then:

$$
\begin{aligned}
\frac{(M^2-m^2)^2c^2}{4M^2} &= m^2\frac{1}{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}v^2 \\
\frac{(M^2-m^2)^2}{4M^2} &= \frac{m^2v^2}{c^2-v^2} \\
(M^2-m^2)^2c^2 - (M^2-m^2)^2v^2 &= 4M^2m^2v^2 \\
((M^2-m^2)^2+4M^2m^2)v^2 &= (M^2-m^2)^2c^2 \\
(M^2+m^2)^2v^2 &= (M^2-m^2)^2c^2 \\
v &= \frac{M^2-m^2}{M^2+m^2}c \\
\end{aligned}
$$

Is that the correct result?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #12
Thanks for the helping!
 
  • #13
The way I did it, with ##E, p = E_R, p_R## and ##c = 1##:

Momentum conservation gives $$p = p_{\gamma} = E_{\gamma}$$
Energy conservation gives: $$M = E + E_{\gamma} = E + p$$
This gives $$E^2 = M^2 + p^2 - 2Mp$$
Now, combining this with ##E^2 = p^2 + m^2## gives: $$p = \frac{M^2 - m^2}{2M}$$
And, we can also solve for $$E = M - p = \frac{M^2 + m^2}{2M}$$
Finally: $$v = \frac p E = \frac{M^2 - m^2}{M^2 + m^2}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
  • #14
Note that the energy-momentum diagram of this process looks like
the Doppler effect on a spacetime diagram ( a triangle with two future-pointing timelike segments from a common event, with their tips joined by a lightlike vector).
[A polygon in an energy-momentum diagram encodes the conservation of total 4-momentum.]

In analogy to ##T'=kT##$ (in the Bondi calculus [my insight],
where ##k## is the Doppler factor [the k-factor]), we have ##M=km##.
So, ##k=\frac{M}{m}##.
Since the Doppler factor ##k=\sqrt{\frac{1+v}{1-v}}## [that is, ##\exp\theta=\sqrt{\frac{1+\tanh\theta}{1-\tanh\theta}}##], we have $$v=\frac{k^2-1}{k^2+1}=\frac{\left(\frac{M}{m}\right)^2-1}{\left(\frac{M}{m}\right)^2+1}$$
in agreement with the other methods.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K