Is My Thought Process Correct for Interference Patterns?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding interference patterns in physics, specifically the relationship between maxima and minima in wave behavior. The original poster is confused about the concept of "length" associated with maxima and minima and attempts to derive a solution by combining wavelengths. Participants suggest clarifying the definitions of distances and angles related to the interference pattern and recommend drawing diagrams to visualize the problem better. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the principles of constructive and destructive interference to correctly analyze the situation. Revisiting foundational concepts in interference is advised for better comprehension.
echoi11
1. The problem statement, all variables, and given/known data
The problem is attached.

Homework Equations


I do not know any relevant equations to this matter but I believe that a maximum has the length of λ and a minimum has the length of λ/2.

The Attempt at a Solution


I see one maximum and one minimum so I decided to add (λ) and (λ/2) together to get (3/2)*λ.
I was wondering if my thought process was correct or not.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-08-12 at 12.05.39 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-08-12 at 12.05.39 PM.png
    50.9 KB · Views: 538
Physics news on Phys.org
echoi11 said:
1. The problem statement, all variables, and given/known data
The problem is attached.

Homework Equations


I do not know any relevant equations to this matter but I believe that a maximum has the length of λ and a minimum has the length of λ/2.

The Attempt at a Solution


I see one maximum and one minimum so I decided to add (λ) and (λ/2) together to get (3/2)*λ.
I was wondering if my thought process was correct or not.
Looks like the right answer to me, but your reasoning seems a bit odd. Can you try to be a bit clearer? What do you mean by a maximum having a "length" of λ?
 
haruspex said:
Looks like the right answer to me, but your reasoning seems a bit odd. Can you try to be a bit clearer? What do you mean by a maximum having a "length" of λ?
I thought a bright maximum has a length of λ while a dark minimum has a length of λ/2. Is my justification of the answer incorrect?
 
echoi11 said:
I thought a bright maximum has a length of λ
I still do not know what you mean by the length of a maximum or minimum. I would say each has a width and a distance from some reference point.
 
haruspex said:
I still do not know what you mean by the length of a maximum or minimum. I would say each has a width and a distance from some reference point.

Oh ok. How do you determine the answer from using width and distance from a reference point in the problem?
 
echoi11 said:
Oh ok. How do you determine the answer from using width and distance from a reference point in the problem?
You don't. Those are not what matters here.
But.. just realized I misread the question. I now think your answer is wrong. Give me a minute or two...
 
haruspex said:
You don't. Those are not what matters here.
But.. just realized I misread the question. I now think your answer is wrong. Give me a minute or two...
Ok. no problem.
 
echoi11 said:
Ok. no problem.
Ok, I'm back.
Draw a diagram, top view. On the left, you have the two slits, one above the other; on the right you have the screen with the maximally bright band, below that a dark band, below that another bright band, then the dark band of interest.
For reference, label the centres of these bands A, B, C, D respectively, and label the two slits U (upper) and L (lower).
What can you say about the distances UA, LA? What about the distances UC, LC?
 
haruspex said:
You don't. Those are not what matters here.
But.. just realized I misread the question. I now think your answer is wrong. Give me a minute or two...
haruspex said:
Ok, I'm back.
Draw a diagram, top view. On the left, you have the two slits, one above the other; on the right you have the screen with the maximally bright band, below that a dark band, below that another bright band, then the dark band of interest.
For reference, label the centres of these bands A, B, C, D respectively, and label the two slits U (upper) and L (lower).
What can you say about the distances UA, LA? What about the distances UC, LC?
Ok I drew the two diagrams. From my diagram, it appears that the distances form triangles and therefore angles.
 
  • #10
echoi11 said:
Ok I drew the two diagrams. From my diagram, it appears that the distances form triangles and therefore angles.
haruspex said:
Ok, I'm back.
Draw a diagram, top view. On the left, you have the two slits, one above the other; on the right you have the screen with the maximally bright band, below that a dark band, below that another bright band, then the dark band of interest.
For reference, label the centres of these bands A, B, C, D respectively, and label the two slits U (upper) and L (lower).
What can you say about the distances UA, LA? What about the distances UC, LC?
The distances are 2λ apart?
 
  • #11
echoi11 said:
The distances are 2λ apart?
Your use of "apart" makes me doubtful. Please post your diagram.
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
Your use of "apart" makes me doubtful. Please post your diagram.
This is what I got.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1868.JPG
    IMG_1868.JPG
    29.3 KB · Views: 488
  • #13
echoi11 said:
This is what I got.
Ok, but what in that are you saying are "2λ apart"? Can you write that statement as an equation using the lengths UA, LA etc. or mark it on the diagram?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
Ok, but what in that are you saying are "2λ apart"? Can you write that statement as an equation using the lengths UA, LA etc. or mark it on the diagram?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1869.JPG
    IMG_1869.JPG
    36 KB · Views: 465
  • #15
I think you are saying your L+nλ are distances from the marked dot on the screen, right?
If so, no.
Let's back up a bit... where should the brightest spot on the screen be in relation to the slits?
 
  • #16
haruspex said:
I think you are saying your L+nλ are distances from the marked dot on the screen, right?
If so, no.
Let's back up a bit... where should the brightest spot on the screen be in relation to the slits?
ohhh. The middle is where the brightest spot should be.
 
  • #17
echoi11 said:
ohhh. The middle is where the brightest spot should be.
Yes. And think more about the distances UA, LA etc. How are they related through λ?
 
  • #18
haruspex said:
Yes. And think more about the distances UA, LA etc. How are they related through λ?
im not too sure, but I believe it is a λ to go up each time and a -λ to go down each time.
 
  • #19
echoi11 said:
im not too sure, but I believe it is a λ to go up each time and a -λ to go down each time.
You are still being too vague for me to know what you mean. Do please try to be clearer. What is going up and down by λ?
 
  • #20
haruspex said:
You are still being too vague for me to know what you mean. Do please try to be clearer. What is going up and down by λ?
To get to more max or min, you either move 1λ or (λ/2).
 
  • #21
haruspex said:
You are still being too vague for me to know what you mean. Do please try to be clearer. What is going up and down by λ?
Sorry I am confused as well.
 
  • #22
echoi11 said:
To get to more max or min, you either move 1λ or (λ/2).
Move what, where?
If you mean move λ across the screen, no.
 
  • #23
haruspex said:
Move what, where?
If you mean move λ across the screen, no.
Im sorry. I just don't get it. Could you explain it to me?
 
  • #24
echoi11 said:
Im sorry. I just don't get it. Could you explain it to me?
What causes a dark band?
 
  • #25
haruspex said:
What causes a dark band?
Loss of energy? I am not sure. I am sure the answer is (3/2)λ, but I am unsure how to get there.
 
  • #26
echoi11 said:
Loss of energy?.
Interference.
Where two waves of the same frequency are in phase, they add, producing a bright area. Where they are out of phase they cancel, making a dark area.
At the slits, the two are in phase. Why would they become out of phase at some places on the screen?
 
  • #27
haruspex said:
Interference.
Where two waves of the same frequency are in phase, they add, producing a bright area. Where they are out of phase they cancel, making a dark area.
At the slits, the two are in phase. Why would they become out of phase at some places on the screen?[/QUOTe
Because of destructive interference.
 
  • #28
echoi11 said:
Because of destructve interference
No, that is the result. I am asking about the cause. If they start off in phase, why can they be out of phase at some point on the screen?
Draw a ray from each slit to some point on the screen. Show the rays as sine curves of the same wavelength. If each is at the top of a wave at its slit, why might they be at different parts of the wave at the point on the screen?
Diagram 87 at
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/302l/lectures/node151.html might help.
 
  • #29
echoii
May I suggest that you forget the question for a while and go back and revise interference. The question seems to be at A level standard and if you do some searches you should find the information you need. Have you seen the CGP revision guides? I think they are very good and can help you a lot if you get hold of one. Try googling. Once you've got the basics of interference behind you come back to the question. Good luck.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
974