Is n(n-1)(2n-1) Always Divisible by 6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The expression n(n-1)(2n-1) is always divisible by 6 for integer values of n, specifically when n is greater than or equal to 2. The proof relies on the properties of consecutive integers, where either n or n-1 is even, ensuring divisibility by 2. Additionally, among n, n-1, and 2n-1, at least one must be divisible by 3, confirming the overall divisibility by 6. The analysis includes cases for n expressed as 3k, 3k+1, and 3k+2, demonstrating the conditions under which the expression holds true.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integer properties and divisibility rules
  • Familiarity with algebraic expressions and manipulation
  • Knowledge of modular arithmetic, particularly with respect to 3
  • Basic concepts of even and odd integers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of consecutive integers and their implications on divisibility
  • Learn about modular arithmetic and its applications in proofs
  • Explore the concept of divisibility in algebraic expressions
  • Investigate more complex proofs involving integer sequences and divisibility
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory or algebraic proofs, particularly those focusing on divisibility and properties of integers.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


show that n(n-1)(2n-1) is always divisible by 6.

The Attempt at a Solution


I see how to get the factor of 2 if n is even then n is divisible by 2.
is n is odd then n-1 is even.
Here is my idea to get the factor of 3.
we know that n and n-1 are consecutive integers.
and we know that if n is divisible by 3 then so is 2n and the same goes for
n-1 but 2n-1 comes right before 2n, so we could some how make an argument as to why
n or n-1 or 2n-1 is divisible by 3. I need to think about it more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If n or (n-1) are divisible by 3 then your problem is solved.

If not, n+1 surely is divisible by 3.

Hence

n+1 = 3k, where k is some integer

Hence

2n -1 = 2 (3k-1) - 1

2n-1=3(2k-1)

Hence (2n-1) has to be divisible by 3.

QED
 
It's not clear what is meant by 'always divisible by 6'.

By inspection, n(n-1)(2n-1) is divisible by 6 IFF n >= 2
 
I would break this up into cases, some of which you already addressed. Consider the possible choices for n. The three cases are

n = 3k
n=3k+1
n=3k+2

where k is an integer. Consider

\frac{n(n-1)(2n-1)}{6}

What happens when you substitute each case in for n into the fraction above?
 
Last edited:
SteamKing said:
It's not clear what is meant by 'always divisible by 6'.

By inspection, n(n-1)(2n-1) is divisible by 6 IFF n >= 2

I think the issue should actually be that n must itself be an integer. However, there is nothing wrong with n = 0, n = 1, (in both cases, the product is 0, which is divisible by 6), or even if n is a negative integer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K