Is nuclear fusion without radioactive waste possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chiel555
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Nuclear fusion without radioactive waste is currently not possible, as it requires aneutronic fusion reactions that do not produce neutrons. The p + 11B reaction is a potential candidate but necessitates extremely high temperatures and pressures. The more common d + t fusion produces 14.1 MeV neutrons, leading to radioactive contamination of structural materials over time. While d + d fusion can occur, it also produces neutrons about 50% of the time. Additionally, the d + 3He reaction is viable but demands even higher temperatures, complicating the process further.
Chiel555
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
-----+-
Is nuclear fusion without radioactive waste possible ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Chiel555 said:
Is nuclear fusion without radioactive waste possible ?
Not as yet. This would require an aneutronic fusion reaction, i.e., a fusion reaction that does not produce neutrons.

One reaction of interest is the p + 11B reaction, which requires very high temperatures, with corresponding high pressures.

The easiest reaction to accomplish is the d + t fusion, but that produces 14.1 MeV neutrons, which escape the plasma or reaction site and eventually find an atomic nucleus in the surrounding structure. A nucleus absorbs a neutron, increases the atomic mass by 1 amu, which most of the is radioactive. Over time, the structural material becomes radioactive.

d+d fusion is also possible, but produces a neutron about 50% of the time.

Another reaction is d + 3He -> p + 4He, but that requires a higher temperature than d+d or d+t. However, with d in the plasma, some d + d reactions will necessarily occur.

The higher the Z (atomic number) the greater the losses due to recombination, bremsstrahlung radiation, not to mention the increased electron pressure (Z electrons to maintain charge neutrality).
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Alex A, Lord Jestocost, PeterDonis and 2 others
I'd like to start a discussion/debate of nuclear power for the purpose of informing people about it. I am participating in a thread in another forum http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=9370 where we are discussing an article about Germany planning to phase out nuclear power. I am STRONGLY against this. It is bad for scientific, economic, political, and environmental reasons. In the course of discussions of the nuclear power issue, it seems to me that the arguements...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K