Is our complementary solution guaranteed to be linearly independent?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the linear independence of complementary solutions to second-order homogeneous ordinary differential equations (ODEs). It is established that solutions generated through standard techniques are guaranteed to be linearly independent, as confirmed by the Wronskian. The solutions can indeed be viewed as a basis in a vector space, where the dimension corresponds to the order of the ODE. For non-homogeneous equations, the solutions form a linear manifold rather than a vector space, as the particular solution cannot be expressed as a linear combination of the basis functions from the homogeneous case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order homogeneous ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with the Wronskian for verifying linear independence
  • Basic knowledge of vector spaces and linear algebra concepts
  • Experience with variation of parameters for finding particular solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Wronskian method for verifying linear independence of solutions
  • Learn about the theory of linear manifolds in the context of differential equations
  • Explore the method of variation of parameters in detail for solving non-homogeneous ODEs
  • Investigate the implications of distinct real roots in the auxiliary equation for ODEs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineering students, and anyone involved in solving ordinary differential equations, particularly those focusing on linear independence and solution spaces.

dumbQuestion
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
I had kind of a general question. Say I have a second order, homogeneous ODE. Say I use one of the general techniques to generate a complementary solution for my ODE and I end up with something of the form y = C1(solution1) + C2(solution2)

Am I gauranteed that these two solutions will be linearly independent or do I need to verify with the Wronskian each time?


Also, can I think of linearly independent solutions as a "basis" like I do in linear algebra? It seems like it because its my understanding that any solution for the ODE is simply a linear combination of solutions in this "basis"


Also, can we tell the dimensions of this basis based on the order of the ODE? Like, a second order ODE has two solutions in its basis, a third order has 3, a first order has one, etc.


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can think of the solutions as a basis in a vector space. In this case, they're basis functions in a space of functions, but most of the ideas from vector algebra still apply.

I think often the techniques chosen to generate solutions are meant to come up with solutions out of orthogonal functions--sines and cosines, for instance, are automatically linlearly independent as long as none of their frequencies are the same. Someone may know more on this matter, though.
 
A complementary solution can't be "dependent" on the solution to the homogeneous equation. Suppose the equation is L(f)= g(x) where L is the linear differential operator, u(x) a linear combination of the independent solutions to the homogenelus equation, and v(x) a complementary solution. To be dependent means that there exist numbers, a and b, non-zero, such that au(x)+ bv(x)= 0. Applying L to both sides of that, L(au(x)+ bv(x))= aL(u)+ bL(v)= a(0)+ b(g)= 0 so that bg(x)= 0 for all x. Since g is not always 0, b= 0. That makes our original equation au(x)= 0 for all x and so a= 0.

The solutions to any linear homogeneus nth order differential equation form a vector space of dimension n. The solutions to a non-homogeneous linear equation do NOT form a vector space but do form a "linear manifold". If you think of a one-dimensional vector space as a line through the origin of a xy-coordinate system, or a two dimensional vector space as a plane through the origin of a xyz-coordinate system, then you can think of a one dimensional "linear manifold" as a line NOT through the origin or a two dimensional "linear manifold" NOT through the origin.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
If you think of a one-dimensional vector space as a line through the origin of a xy-coordinate system, or a two dimensional vector space as a plane through the origin of a xyz-coordinate system, then you can think of a one dimensional "linear manifold" as a line NOT through the origin or a two dimensional "linear manifold" NOT through the origin.
Thank you, this really does help me visualize this.So I want to make sure I understand. So for example, when dealing with non homogeneous equations, does it mean we can't establish a "basis" or fundamental set of solutions so that every particular solution can be expressed as a linear combination of those solutions?THe thing that prompted me to ask was this particular problem:y'' - 5y' + 4y = 8ex

I can generate a basis for the vector space of solutions for the associated homogeneous equation and its B = {e4x,ex} (I got this by solving the auxilary equation and attaining distinct real roots x=4 and x=1)

Using variation of parameters, I can then generate a particular solution for this sytem:

yp=(-8/9)ex-(8/3)xexTo make sure it is indeed a particular solution I took y'p and y''p and plugged it into the original ODE and it does check out. However, yp is not a linear combination of the functions in B.
 
oh wait I think I get it, the "basis" as I'm thinking of it for a nohomogeneous linear 2nd order ODE would be B={b1,b2,yp}where b1 and b2 are the functions in the basis for the associated homogeneous ODE and yp is a particular solution satisfying the non homogeneous ODE.EDIT: Oh waaaait... No what I just wrote is wrong. Any solution Y(x) of the non homogeneous system can be expressed as:

Y=C1b1+C2b2+ypSo I can see why {b1,b2,yp} is NOT a "basis" because we can't just have any linear combination of these to generate solutions, the solutions are linear combinations of b1 and b2 with yp simply added on (not any multiple of yp)! So this is why it's not a vector space but a linear manifold as you described it
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K