MHB Is \(\pi\) Algebraic of Degree 3 Over Any Extension of \(\mathbb{Q}\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite
Kiwi1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Q7. Name an extension of \(\mathbb{Q}\) over which \(\pi\) is algebraic of degree 3.

I have a very simple answer to this (below) but is it correct? Is it likely to be what the text is after?

\(\mathbb{Q}(\pi^3)\) is an extension of \(\mathbb{Q}\), it is not an algebraic extension but I am not asked in the first 5 words for it to be algebtaic.

Now \(\mathbb{Q}(\pi)\) is an algebraic extension of \(\mathbb{Q}(\pi^3)\) with degree 3 because \(\pi\) is a root of: \(x^3-\pi^3\)

Is this what they are after? I can't see any way that pi can be algebraic over Q directly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pi is *not* algebraic over $\Bbb Q$, that is to say, it is transcendental over $\Bbb Q$ ($\Bbb Q[\pi] \cong \Bbb Q[x]$), so your answer looks fine.

The question is probably just asking you to realize not all extensions of a field are algebraic extensions, and that being an algebraic extension depends *crucially* on the underlying field. Deciding "which" field extensions ARE algebraic can often be difficult, as there are many real numbers, for example, for which it is unknown whether or not they are algebraic over $\Bbb Q$.

The only thing missing (and I do not know if your instructor expects this) is showing that $x^3 - \pi^3$ is, in fact, irreducible over $\Bbb Q(\pi^3)$ (hint: $\Bbb Q(\pi^3) \subset \Bbb R$).
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top