Is Potential Flow Unique in Real Life?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the uniqueness of potential flow solutions in fluid dynamics, specifically addressing how different methods can yield non-unique results under the same boundary conditions. The panel sheet method and vortex sheet method can produce identical airfoil shapes but lead to distinct flow patterns. Additionally, the rotating and non-rotating cylinders satisfy the same boundary conditions yet exhibit different flows due to the arbitrary nature of circulation. To achieve a unique solution in potential flow, it is essential to specify circulation, particularly in applications like airfoils where the Kutta Condition must be satisfied for accurate lift generation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential flow theory
  • Familiarity with Laplace's equation
  • Knowledge of the Kutta Condition in aerodynamics
  • Experience with flow visualization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of circulation in potential flow analysis
  • Explore the differences between the panel method and vortex method in airfoil design
  • Learn about the application of the Kutta Condition in computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
  • Investigate the effects of angle of attack on lift generation in airfoils
USEFUL FOR

Aerodynamics engineers, fluid dynamics researchers, and students studying potential flow theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of flow solutions and their practical applications in airfoil design.

flasherffff
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
there is something i can't seem to get about potential flow,

when we work with potential flows we combine some simple potential flows to satisfy some boundary condition (shape of the body and potential at infinity),
we get the resulting flow and we assume that that is the flow in reality

BUT (this is what bothers me) the potential flow that satisfies those boundary condition (shape of the body) is not unique.

example 1: the panel sheet method and vortex sheet method can produce the same external airfoil shape ,but have different flow patterns around them

example 2:the rotating vs the non rotating cylinder
both flows satisfy the same boundary conditions but are different

so... how can we assume that some solution to a given geometry is like reality ,when the solution isn't even unique mathematically
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In potential flow, the solution to Laplace's equation is unique to within a specified constant. Therefore to obtain a unique solution it is necessary to specify this constant and this constant is the circulation. In the case of the rotating cylinder the circulation is completely arbitrary but must be specified. So even though the boundary conditions of the non-rotating cylinder and the rotating cylinder are the same the flows are different because for the rotating cylinder there is circulation.

For the airfoil you don't directly specify the circulation but rather you require that the circulation is chosen to satisfy the Kutta Condition which requires the flow to leave the trailing edge smoothly. So if you place panels on the airfoil surface and then place sources on the panels you can satisfy the boundary conditions and create the airfoil shape but there will be no circulation and therefore no lift. And if the airfoil is at an angle of attack the stagnation point on the trailing edge will be in the wrong place. If you instead use vortices on the panels and indirectly specify the circulation by using the kutta condition you will get the correct trailing edge stagnation point and lift will be generated.

So in summary you must specify the circulation in order to have a unique solution.
 
thank you!
this helped a lot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
627
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
3K